Back

Scarlet Fever and Meteorological Exposures in Jiangsu, China: A Time-stratified Case-crossover Study

Wang, K.; Liu, W.; Zhu, H.; Tang, Y.; Ji, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ling, C.

2025-03-13 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.03.11.25323804 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIncreasing interest arises in the association between short-term meteorological exposure and scarlet fever risk, but the association with individual-level infection risk remains poorly understood. MethodsWe collected weather data from ERA5-Land (hourly, 9 km x 9 km) and aggregated into daily exposures to match all scarlet fever cases data in Jiangsu, reported the Nationwide Notifiable Infectious Diseases Reporting Information System from 2005 to 2023. We conducted a time-stratified case-crossover study with associations quantified by odds ratio (ORs) with confidence interval (CI) from conditional logistic regressions with distributed lag non-linear models. ResultsThe odds ratios are generally significant with a 2-5 days lag, peaking at 3 days: 0.991 (95% CI: 0.986, 0.995) for temperature, 0.995 (95% CI: 0.994, 0.996) for relative humidity, 0.994 (95% CI: 0.990, 0.997) for total precipitation, 1.009 (95% CI: 1.005, 1.012) for solar radiation, and 1.088 (95% CI: 1.057, 1.120) for surface pressure. For non-linear effects, temperature showed a reversed U-shaped curve with peak risk between 15.17{degrees}C and 19{degrees}C and fluctuated risk at extremely low temperatures (below -5{degrees}C). Relative humidity posed a higher risk between 56% and 80%. Children aged over 6 exhibit greater susceptibility with stronger associations in temperature and surface pressure. Stronger associations were found in the post-COVID-19 era (2020-2023), particularly for temperature, solar radiation, and surface pressure. ConclusionsOur study suggested significant non-linear associations between meteorological factors and scarlet fever risk, and provided some insights into the vulnerable children and the immune debt after COVID-19.

Published in BMC Public Health (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.