Evolution of attitudes toward people with disabilities in healthcare practitioners and other occupations from 2006 to 2024: A comparative study
Boisgontier, M. P.
Show abstract
PurposeHealthcare practitioners have shown implicit and explicit attitudes that disfavor people with disabilities. This study aimed to describe how these attitudes evolved between 2006 and 2024 across clinicians, rehabilitation assistants, and other occupations. MethodsIn this comparative repeated cross-sectional study, data from 660,430 participants from Project Implicit were analyzed. Implicit attitudes were assessed using D-scores derived from the Disability Implicit Association Test. Explicit attitudes were assessed using a Likert scale. Generalized additive models were conducted to test the evolution of attitudes over time. ResultsExplicit attitudes toward people with disabilities became less unfavorable over time, following a linear pattern. No such effect was found for implicit attitudes. However, non-linear interactions between time, occupation group, and sex suggest a complex effect of time on attitudes that should be interpreted in the context of each specific combination of occupation group and sex, rather than assuming a uniform trend. Attitudes were less favorable toward people with physical disabilities than general disabilities. ConclusionsThe contrast between evolution of implicit and explicit attitudes suggests that implicit bias remains resistant to change despite improving explicit consideration of people with disabilities. Knowledge of these patterns may inform training programs to reduce bias in healthcare and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experienced inclusion and recognition amongst people with spinal cord injury: A comparative study in Norway, The Netherlands, and Australia 94%
- Accessibility and Disability Inclusion Among Top-Funded U.S. Undergraduate Institutions 93%
- Impact of visual impairment on balance and visual processing functions in students with special educational needs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 93%
- Validation of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) and reference norms in a French-Canadian population with traumatic brain injury receiving rehabilitation 93%
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 91%
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 91%
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 92%
- Retention of visuo-proprioceptive recalibration in estimating hand position 91%
- Effects of combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training on upper limb kinematics in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.