Interruption Managements Skills: Identifying and Addressing the Learning Needs of Medical Students: A Protocol for an Interview-based Study
Javaid, A.; Morgan, P.; Riley, S.; Tombs, M.
Show abstract
Background and objectivesInterruptions during clinical activities are strongly associated with patient safety incidents in healthcare settings. Attempts have been made to teach medical students and doctors how to best manage interruptions, however evidence suggests that most doctors develop these skills through experience and that students feel ill-prepared when confronted with interruptions in the clinical setting. This study protocol presents a study that aims to inform, the development of an educational tool for undergraduate medical students on management on interruption management in the clinical setting. Informed by the ADDIE model of instructional design, a learning needs analysis will be conducted to determine what skills are needed to best manage workplace interruptions and how these skills would best be taught at an undergraduate level. Methods and AnalysisThis study will collect data through semi-structured interviews with medical students, medical educators and junior doctors. The interview protocol has been developed using the Critical Incidence Technique, in which real-life experiences will be used as a basis for reflection to determine what underlying lessons can be learnt from them. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and undergo thematic analysis to determine what instructional goals need to be set for an educational tool and how such a tool should be designed. Ethics and DisseminationThis study has received full ethical approval from Cardiff University (SREC reference 23/67). Findings from the study will be disseminated by presentation at national and international conferences and publication through academic papers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Measuring the impact of an interdisciplinary learning project on nursing, architecture and landscape design students empathy 94%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 92%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 91%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.