Predicting agranulocytosis in patients treated with clozapine - development and validation of a machine learning algorithm based on 5,550 patients
Oloyede, E.; Lopez Alcaraz, J. M.; Whiskey, E.; Dzahini, O.; Joyce, D. W.; Shergill, S.; Strodthoff, N.; Taylor, D.; Bachmann, C. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo prevent clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA), patients white blood cell counts are closely monitored, with treatment stopped if the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) drops below 1.5x109/L. While effective, this approach has a high rate of false positives. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) decision-making tool to better predict CIA risk using pattern-based criteria (two consecutive ANCs <0.5x109/L over [≥]2 days). MethodsUsing a ML technique [gradient-boosted decision trees (GDBT)] we analysed clinical data from 5,550 UK patients treated with clozapine: 2,190 controls with no history of neutropenia and 3,360 cases with at least one neutropenic event, including 358 with pattern-based CIA. Using haematological and demographic data from the current and three prior time windows, predictive models estimated the likelihood of CIA across four time-windows: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months respectively in advance. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. We developed another model to predict baseline risk of CIA and compared performance with genetic tests. Explainability analyses identified key features influencing predictions. OutcomesGDBT models demonstrated strong predictive performance: 1-week forecasting horizon: AUROC 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-0.99]; 2 weeks: AUROC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]; 1 month: AUROC 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.94]; 3 months: AUROC 0.90 [95% CI: 0.88-0.92]. The baseline model achieved better performance than current genetic tests, with high specificity and sensitivity at varying thresholds. Key discriminative features for CIA included age and baseline haematological values for longer forecasting horizons (1 and 3 months) and current haematological values and treatment duration for shorter horizons (1 and 2 weeks). InterpretationML models reliably predict CIA occurrence across short- and long-term horizons, potentially reducing the number of false positives with the current system. Implementation of ML models can reduce unnecessary treatment interruptions and the need for additional blood tests due to suspected agranulocytosis. FundingThe study did not receive direct funding. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSThe only antipsychotic that is effective for treatmentresistant psychosis is clozapine. Tragically, many patients with treatment-resistant psychosis never receive clozapine treatment or receive it many years after "treatmentresistance". A prominent reason for this is blood tests that are required to detect potential clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA). Despite monitoring being effective, several patients have had to stop clozapine unnecessarily because of the current haematological criteria for discontinuation. In many of these patients, this has resulted in poor clinical and social outcomes. Additionally, many cases of agranulocytosis are identified late under the existing monitoring protocols. At present, there is no reliable way of predicting clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA). Added value of this studyThis is the first study to propose that a machine-learning decision tool can reliably predict CIA before it occurs in both the short term and long term. 0.1. Implications of all the available evidenceImplementation of machine learning algorithms allow prediction of agranulocytosis so that clozapine can be appropriate stopped before it occurs. The algorithm can also prevent unnecessary stopping of clozapine and additional blood testing that is related to spurious blood results.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A distinct four-value blood signature of pyrexia under combination therapy of malignant melanoma with BRAF/MEK-inhibitors evidenced by an algorithm-defined pyrexia score 93%
- Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders 92%
- Applying machine learning in motor activity time series of depressed bipolar and unipolar patients. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mediation and Longitudinal Analysis to interpret the association between clozapine pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, and absolute neutrophil count 92%
- Clozapine prescribing in Germany: temporal trends and regional variations, 2012 to 2022 88%
- Prevalence of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies among adult Chinese patients presenting with first-episode psychosis in Hong Kong 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline 91%
- MTXPK.org: A clinical decision support tool evaluating high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics to inform post-infusion care and use of glucarpidase 90%
- A dose-finding study to guide use of verapamil as an adjunctive therapy in tuberculosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital in pediatric patients 91%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 90%
- Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Effect of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in the Prevention of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 91%
- Network-based estimation of therapeutic efficacy and adverse reaction potential for prioritisation of anti-cancer drug combinations 88%
- TCR_Explore: a novel webtool for T cell receptor repertoire analysis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.