Back

Hyperkalemia-related Heart Failure Therapy Discontinuation and the Association with Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure

Gupta, A.; Islam, S.; Dover, D. C.; Kaul, P.; McAlister, F.; Ezekowitz, J.

2025-03-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.03.06.25323518 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRenin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are essential treatments for heart failure (HF) patients, but their use is often limited by hyperkalemia. ObjectiveThis study assesses the incidence of hyperkalemia in chronic HF patients on RAAS inhibitors, examines changes in therapy following hyperkalemia episodes, and evaluates the impact of RAAS inhibitor discontinuation or down-titration on patient outcomes. MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study of patients hospitalized or visiting the emergency department in Alberta for chronic HF from April 2012 to March 2020, focusing on those with RAAS inhibitor-associated hyperkalemia. Episodes of hyperkalemia (K >5.0 mmol/L) were monitored, and patients were followed for 30 days to determine if their RAAS therapy was maintained, reduced, or discontinued. ResultsAmong 7527 HF patients, we identified 123,038 RAAS inhibitor treatment years, resulting in 17 hyperkalemia events per 100 treatment years. Hyperkalemia led to RAAS inhibitor discontinuation in 35.2% of cases, down-titration in 8.4%, and continuation in 56.4%. Discontinuation or down-titration was more common when serum potassium exceeded 6.0 mmol/L (49.4%) compared to lower levels. Over a median follow-up of 1.4 years, discontinuing or down-titrating RAAS inhibitors was associated with increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.80), higher cardiovascular hospitalizations (aHR 1.09), and more frequent ED visits for HF (aHR 1.17) compared to continued therapy. ConclusionsDiscontinuation or down-titration of RAAS inhibitors in HF patients is associated with higher mortality and cardiovascular events. Strategies to maintain RAAS therapy after hyperkalemia episodes may improve patient outcomes.

Published in JACC: Heart Failure · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.