Profile of deaths mentioning ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in Brazil: a population-based machine learning analysis
de Souza, A. R. M.; Raposo, L. M.; de Lacerda, G. C. B.; Godoy, P. H.
Show abstract
Background and objectiveBrazil has the highest stroke rates in Latin America. The aim of this study was to investigate the profile of deaths mentioning stroke in Brazil between 2000 and 2019 and the relationship between multiple causes of death and stroke subtype. MethodsDeaths mentioning stroke and other conditions were identified using individual death records from the countrys mortality information system (SIM). Strokes were grouped into the following subtypes according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes: ischemic stroke (IS); hemorrhagic stroke (HS); and unspecified stroke (US). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the distribution of stroke subtypes by demographic category, region and period. A decision tree model was built to identify the strongest factors distinguishing IS from HS. ResultsThere were 2,459,742 deaths mentioning stroke. The following sociodemographic groups accounted for the highest proportion of overall deaths in their respective categories: the 60-79 age group (46.6%); white people (57%); married people (41.9%); and people with less than 3 years of education (62.1%). There was a progressive increase in the number of deaths mentioning stroke over the study period. The most common type of stroke was US, accounting for more than 60% of deaths. The most frequent group of causes of death in the subtype HS was hypertensive diseases (40.6%), while the most frequent group in subtypes IS and US was diseases of the respiratory system (48.30% and 42.30%, respectively). The decision tree analysis revealed that IS was more likely to occur in patients aged 60 years and over and in cases where respiratory diseases, endocrine diseases, arrhythmias, ischemic heart disease and heart failure were present. However, in younger patients without the previous mentioned diseases but where diseases of the nervous system were present HS was more frequent. DiscussionThe analysis of multiple causes of death enabled the identification of different diseases and factors associated with deaths mentioning IS, HS and US. The decision tree analysis identified the strongest factors distinguishing IS from HS. These findings can serve as guidance for defining the specific needs of each stroke subtype.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 97%
- High fibrinogen-prealbumin ratio (FPR) predicts stroke-associated pneumonia 95%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 94%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 95%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 95%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admission of Acute Stroke patients in Bangladesh 95%
- Stent For Life Initiative in Portugal: progress through years and Covid-19 Impact 94%
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.