Executive dysfunction relates to salience network desegregation in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Matyi, M. A.; Radhakrishnan, H.; Olm, C. A.; Phillips, J. S.; Cook, P. A.; Rhodes, E.; Gee, J. C.; Irwin, D. J.; McMillan, C. T.; Massimo, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe organization of the brain into distinct networks increases (i.e., differentiation) during development and decreases (i.e., de-differentiation) during healthy aging, changes that are associated with improvements and worsening of cognition, respectively. Given that behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disease associated with executive dysfunction and selective vulnerability of the salience network, we tested the hypotheses that bvFTD structural networks are de-differentiated compared to cognitively normal controls (CNC) and that network de-differentiation relates to worse executive function. MethodsIn a sample of 90 patients with bvFTD and 71 age-matched CNC with diffusion MRI data we generated probabilistic tractography maps and calculated system segregation, a metric that compares within-network to between-network connectivity, to reflect the extent to which brain networks were differentiated. Patients with bvFTD also completed tests of executive function (digit span backwards, phonemic fluency, category fluency) and a control task (lexical retrieval). We assessed group differences in system segregation, reflecting network differentiation, and, within bvFTD, associations between system segregation and neuropsychological test performance. ResultsCompared to CNC, patients with bvFTD exhibited lower system segregation of the salience (p < .001) and global brain network (p = .008). In bvFTD, lower salience network system segregation was associated with worse executive function (pcorrected = .029) but not lexical retrieval. ConclusionsResults demonstrate associations between executive dysfunction and salience network de-differentiation in patients with bvFTD. Our findings indicate that brain network de-differentiation, reflecting reduced neural capacity for specialized processing, may contribute to the emergence of executive dysfunction in bvFTD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural Thalamocortical Network Atrophy in Sporadic Behavioural Variant Frontotemporal Dementia 97%
- Disrupted Brain Connectivity in Children Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy 95%
- Brain age prediction using fMRI network coupling in youths and associations with psychiatric symptoms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network anatomy in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia 97%
- Superficial white matter microstructure affects processing speed in cerebral small vessel disease 96%
- Fronto-parietal effective connectivity during working memory in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 adolescents and neurotypical controls 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Employing connectome-based models to predict working memory in multiple sclerosis 96%
- Dementia risk factors modify hubs but leave other connectivity measures unchanged in asymptomatic individuals: a graph theoretical analysis. 95%
- Functional connectivity within and between n-back modulated regions: An adult lifespan PPI investigation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing two principal dimensions of cognitive variation in Logopenic Progressive Aphasia 95%
- White matter hyperintensities are common in midlife and already associated with cognitive decline 95%
- Evaluating the granularity and statistical structure of lesions and behaviour in post-stroke aphasia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal subfields and limbic white matter jointly predict learning rate in older adults 95%
- Contributions of white matter connectivity and BOLD modulation to cognitive aging: A lifespan structure-function association study 95%
- Predicting Executive Functioning from Brain Networks: Modality Specificity and Age Effects 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.