Back

Metacognitive Reactivity and Temporal Perception: The Influence of Confidence Ratings on the Temporal Binding Window

Sachgau, C.; Basharat, A.; Barnett-Cowan, M.

2025-03-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.28.640845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The influence of confidence in assessing the perceived timing of sensory events on perceptual decision-making remains poorly understood. Metacognition--the ability to reflect on ones thought processes -- is often assessed through confidence ratings in perceptual tasks. However, accessing metacognitive information can influence task performance, a phenomenon known as the reactivity effect. This study examines metacognitive reactivity by examining the impact of confidence ratings on the temporal binding window (TBW) in two multisensory time perception tasks that use identical stimuli but require different judgments: Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) and Simultaneity Judgment (SJ). Thirty-five participants (aged 18-39) completed TOJ and SJ tasks with and without confidence ratings via Prolific, an online participant recruitment platform. Psychometric functions were fitted to response and confidence data to determine TBW and the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). Both tasks exhibited reactivity effects, with the effect being stronger in the SJ task. TBW significantly differed between TOJ and SJ tasks, regardless of confidence ratings. Additionally, TBWs from TOJ and SJ tasks were strongly correlated, as were the width parameters of confidence curves, suggesting shared underlying mechanisms in both perceptual and metacognitive processes. These findings highlight the utility of confidence ratings in evaluating TOJ and SJ performance, revealing both task differences and commonalities. We also discuss the potential for training interventions to enhance temporal perception, particularly in older adults. Finally, we reflect on the advantages and challenges of online data collection via Prolific, including its diverse participant pool and timing precision limitations.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
8
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
15
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
27
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
28
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
30
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%