Differential Intrahepatic Integrated HBV DNA Patterns Between HBeAg-Positive and HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B

BackgroundHBsAg can be derived from intrahepatic cccDNA and integrated HBV DNA (iDNA). We examined the iDNA from liver tissues of 24 HBeAg(+) and 32 HBeAg(-) treatment-naive CHB participants. MethodsLiver tissues were obtained from the North American Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN). For cccDNA analysis, DNA was heat-denatured and digested by plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase to remove rcDNA and iDNA prior to qPCR. For iDNA detection, total DNA was subjected to HBV hybridization-targeted next generation sequencing (HBV-NGS) assay. The HBV-host junction sequences were identified by ChimericSeq. Comparison of HBV cccDNA and iDNA with serum and intrahepatic virological parameters were assessed. ResultsIntrahepatic cccDNA, serum HBV DNA, HBV RNA, HBcrAg and qHBsAg were higher among the HBeAg(+) participants. Among the HBeAg(+) samples, 87% had positive intrahepatic HBcAg staining compared to 13% of HBeAg(-) samples (p<0.0001). HBsAg staining, in contrast, was present in over 85% of both HBeAg(+) and (-) livers. 23 (95.8%) HBeAg(+) participants had [&le;]50% iDNA of total HBV DNA whereas 25 (78.1%) HBeAg(-) participants had >50% iDNA in their livers. The iDNA junction-breakpoint distributions for the HBeAg(+) group were random with 15.9% localized to the DR2-DR1 region. In contrast, 52.4% of the iDNA were clustered at DR2-DR1 region among the HBeAg(-) participants. Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) patterns of dslDNA HBV integration was more frequent in HBeAg (+) livers. ConclusionSerum RNA and HBcrAg reflect the intrahepatic cccDNA concentrations. HBeAg(-) CHB participants had high levels of intrahepatic iDNA and HBsAg despite lower cccDNA levels suggesting that iDNA is the primary source of HBsAg in HBeAg(-) CHB.