Global Learning Opportunities Within Social Innovation in Health (GLOWS): Modified Delphi Process to Identify and Pilot Core Competencies for Learning
Wallace, E.; Tao, Y.; Aribodor, O. B.; Zhu, Z.; Borbon, A.; Chakhame, B. M.; Jacob, E. C.; Ahmed, F.; Francis, J. M.; Septiawan, K. G.; Mawuli, K.; Mutisya, L.; Ekasari, M. P.; Azugo, N. O.; Fourie, T.; Alger, J.; Mier, A. R.; Tang, W.; Ruiz, A. S.; Aidoo-Frimpong, G.; Nanono, J.; Montealto, J. J. A.; Ezezika, O.; Kaks, P.; Shan, W.; Mier-Alpano, J. D.; Marley, G.; Halpaap, B.; Chen, E.; Tucker, J. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundSocial innovation in health refers to the community-engaged process that connects health improvement and social change. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus statement on core learning competencies in social innovation in health and pilot them as part of a participatory training workshop. Methods and FindingsA modified Delphi Process aggregating data from a scoping review, global open call, and participatory process was organized. Participants were recruited from low, middle, and high-income countries with a range of social innovation experiences. Statements focused on social innovation in health core competencies for learning. Consensus was determined using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method. After expressing interest in the project, 68 individuals received the survey link. 46 participants completed the first survey, and 34 completed the second survey. All 28 statements reached consensus, and based on the results of this first survey, some statements were added, amended, and merged to reach 30 consensus statements in the second survey. Competencies were categorized into skills, mindsets, and knowledge. Some competencies reached higher levels of agreement than others. This included community engagement, which can leverage the collective knowledge and problem-solving abilities of a diverse group of individuals to tackle complex challenges; social entrepreneurship skills such as business model knowledge, securing funding, team building, and knowledge of intersectional issues and health inequities. Several learning competencies were then piloted as eight one-hour online workshops, which assessed the feasibility of developing them through online open-access social innovation training sessions. After completing the workshops, 137 participants completed a survey, and most participants reported a significant improvement across six competencies. ConclusionThe results from this study will inform the development of a WHO/TDR conceptual framework for teachers and learners in social innovation in health. Author SummaryWhy was this study done? This study was undertaken to develop a consensus statement on core learning competencies in social innovation in health and pilot them as part of a participatory training workshop. What did the researchers do and find? Some of the core competencies that reached high levels of agreement amongst the international panel included community engagement, which can leverage the collective knowledge and problem-solving abilities of a diverse group of individuals to tackle complex challenges; social entrepreneurship skills such as business model knowledge, securing funding, team building, and knowledge of intersectional issues and health inequities. What do these findings mean? These findings are important for fostering social innovation in health training programmes and will inform the development of a WHO/TDR conceptual framework.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Perceptions, Challenges, and Opportunities of UDS Health Professionals' Students and Faculty Regarding Community-Based Education Programs for Interprofessional Education-A study protocol. 95%
- Strengthening health service delivery and governance through institutionalizing ‘Urban Health Atlas’ - a geo-referenced Information Communication and Technology tool: lessons learned from an implementation research in three cities in Bangladesh 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation research for advancing health equity: design and competency-based assessment of a short-term implementation research training program focused on health equity in global health 96%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 94%
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 93%
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 94%
- Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.