Back

The impact of Intensive Care Strain on Patients Outcomes during COVID-19 - a UNITE COVID study

Kohler, K.; De Corte, T.; Greco, M.; Povoa, P.; Cecconi, M.; Ostermann, M.; De Waele, J.; Conway Morris, A.; UNITE-COVID investigators,

2025-02-27 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.02.27.25322947 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIntensive care unit (ICU) strain is associated with increased mortality. Most strain metrics focus on simple measures such as bed occupancy or admission rates. There is limited data on mitigation strategies, such as procedure teams or staff well-being services on strain, or the impact of increased patient-to-nurse ratios and non-ICU trained nurses working in ICU. MethodsUsing the multi-national UNITE-COVID study, collecting data from ICUs on their busiest day in two periods (2020 and 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic, we evaluated metrics of strain (Bed occupancy, patient: nurse ratio, use of non-ICU staff and shortages of consumables) and potential mitigators (procedural support teams and staff well-being interventions). We examined how these related to outcomes (mortality, complications and length of stay). ResultsIn both epochs, ICUs experienced significant strain, with ICU bed expansion to 133% and 163% respectively, whilst patient-to-nurse ratios increased by 0.4 and 0.3. Consumable shortages were widespread in 2020. Mortality was inversely correlated with staff well-being interventions in both epochs. Complications were inversely correlated with procedure support teams, and positively correlated with staffing ratios. In regression models, pressure sores were reduced in presence of support teams (p=0.004) and increased with the increase in patients per nurse (p=0.05) whilst unplanned extubations were related to non-ICU trained staff working in ICU(p = 0.02). ConclusionsCOVID-19 induced ICU strain had effects beyond mortality, including increases in complications. Staff pressure and lack of ICU training were related to specific complications, whilst support teams and well-being interventions were associated with improved outcomes. Take home messageWe examined the effects of various aspects of ICU strain on patient outcomes during the periods of maximal unit occupancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. We identified adverse relationships between preventable complications and increases in patient:nursing ratios and use of non-ICU trained staff, whilst procedural support teams and staff well-being interventions were associated with better patient outcomes. summaryCOVID strained ICUs. Increased patient:staff ratios & non-ICU staff increased complications, staff well-being initiatives improved outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.4%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.2%
3
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
5
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
18
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%