Dynamics of spinal fluid immune cell alterations following cladribine tablet treatment in multiple sclerosis
Smirnov, R. A.; Cantoni, C.; Lee, K.; Agnihotri, R. A.; Axtell, R. C.; Salter, A.; Lancia, S.; Paley, M. A.; Hayward, B.; Korich, J.; Evans, E.; Pardo, G.; Stuve, O.; Bar-Or, A.; Artyomov, M. N.; Cross, A. H.; Edelson, B. T.; Wu, G. F.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesOral cladribine tablet (CladT) therapy is efficacious for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the mechanisms by which cladribine exerts benefit in MS remain unclear, particularly regarding its effects on compartmentalized inflammation within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). MethodsTranscriptional profiles along with T and B lymphocyte receptor repertoires from CSF and blood were obtained by single cell sequencing methods from a single site participating in a phase IV clinical trial investigating the impact of cladribine treatment for MS. All subjects provided blood and CSF samples immediately before starting CladT therapy and were randomized to also provide samples at either five weeks, ten weeks, one year, or two years post-CladT therapy. Thirty-four samples from 13 individuals with relapsing MS before and after treatment were available to test the hypothesis that CladT alters the composition and phenotype of lymphocytes in the CSF. ResultsWe found that treatment with CladT profoundly altered cellular composition, but not the transcriptional phenotype, of immune cells in the CSF. In particular, we identified a reduction of switched memory B cells but recovery of naive B cells in the CSF, similar to our findings in blood. Additionally, populations of CD4 Treg cells emerged early after CladT therapy and remained elevated one year later in the CSF, but not in the blood. Antigen receptor sequencing revealed a moderate decrease in numbers of large clonally expanded CD8 T cell clones (>10 cells/clone) primarily in the CSF, but also in the blood post-CladT treatment. DiscussionOur results identified unique cellular dynamics and changes in T and B cell clonality in both tissues which can potentially explain long-term beneficial effects of CladT therapy in MS, including preservation of immune function and relatively low number of side effects. Altogether, this study demonstrates that CladT treatment had a substantial impact not only on blood, but also on the CSF compartment highlighting the importance of cross-tissue analysis for better understanding of effect and the mechanism of action of DMTs.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination fails to elicit humoral and cellular immune responses in multiple sclerosis patients receiving fingolimod 97%
- Genetic subtypes predict multiple sclerosis severity and response to treatment 93%
- Neuroinflammation predicts disease progression in progressive supranuclear palsy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative transcriptomic analysis of mouse demyelination models and Multiple Sclerosis lesions 95%
- Impact of genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis on the T cell epigenome: proximal and distal effects 95%
- Single-cell transcriptomics identifies drivers of local inflammation in multiple sclerosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 third vaccine immune response in MS patients treated with ocrelizumab 94%
- A novel mouse model of cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy highlights NLRP3 activity in lesion pathogenesis 94%
- Cellular and humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple sclerosis patients on ocrelizumab and other disease-modifying therapies: a multi-ethnic observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced antibody and T cell immunity 97%
- Rapamycin rescues loss-of-function in blood-brain barrier-interacting regulatory T cells 95%
- Probing the basis of disease heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis using genetically diverse mice 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.