Back

Identification of astrocytomas through serum protein fingerprint using MALDI-TOF MS and machine learning

Lazari, L. C.; Silva, J. M.; Donado, P. R. S.; Shinjo, S. M. O.; Fernandes, L. R.; Ieva, A. D.; Palmisano, G.; Marie, S. K. N.

2025-02-27 systems biology
10.1101/2025.02.21.639567 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gliomas account for most brain malignancies, with astrocytomas being the most common subtype. Among these, glioblastoma (GBM) stands out as the most aggressive form, exhibiting a median survival time of just 15 months despite intensive therapy. Current diagnostic practices rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathological analysis, which often necessitate invasive surgical sampling. This underscores the need for minimally invasive diagnostic tools capable of characterizing glioma progression and guiding treatment strategies. Advances in glioma classification have integrated histological and molecular markers, notably IDH1 mutations, which are prognostically significant, particularly in low-grade gliomas and in the previously defined "secondary GBM" (IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 4). This study aimed to explore the potential of serum proteomics as a non-invasive diagnostic tool using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) combined with machine learning techniques. We analyzed serum samples from 269 patients, employing machine learning models to differentiate between healthy individuals and astrocytoma patients. The MALDI-TOF MS approach achieved a balanced accuracy of 94.5% in distinguishing GBM patients from healthy controls. However, it showed limited efficacy in classifying tumor grades or determining IDH1 mutational status. Further investigation using bottom-up proteomics by GeLC-MS/MS identified potential biomarkers, such as transthyretin, previously associated with high-grade gliomas. These findings highlight the promise of MALDI-TOF MS in identifying serum-based biomarkers for astrocytoma diagnosis. While the results are promising, further validation in independent cohorts is essential to assess the clinical utility of these biomarkers for non-invasive glioma diagnostics and patient monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
19
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%