Strategic Decision Making in Biological and Artificial Brains
deshpande, A.
Show abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it seeks to uncover the algorithms that humans and other animals employ for learning in decision-making strategies within non-zero-sum games, specifically focusing on fully observable iterated prisoners dilemma scenarios. Second, it aims to develop a new model to explain strategic decision-making which reflects previous neurobiological findings showing that different brain circuits are responsible for self-referential processing and understanding others. The model stems from the actor-critic framework and incorporates multiple critics to allow for distinct processing of both self and others state. We validate the biological plausibility and transferability of our algorithm through comparisons with experimental data from human on the iterated prisoners dilemma game.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Opponent Learning with Different Representations in the Cortico-Basal Ganglia Pathways Can Develop Obsession-Compulsion Cycle 96%
- Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models 96%
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Experimental Design in Biology 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting human decision making in psychological tasks with recurrent neural networks 97%
- Collective Evolution Learning Model for Vision-Based Collective Motion with Collision Avoidance 96%
- A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian account of generalist and specialist formation under the Active Inference framework 94%
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 93%
- Retrospective inference as a form of bounded rationality, and its beneficial influence on learning 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.