Using a Novel-Liaison Based Social Media Intervention Utilizing Community Feedback to Improve Organizational Health Literacy in Covid-19 Crisis Communication
Matangi, N.; Granillo, C.; Joachim-Celestin, M.; Fuentes-Estadillo, K.; Irani, C.; Thiruvengadam, N.; Montgomery, S.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed historical pervasive gaps in information and resources for vulnerable communities. In an academic community partnered response of a consortium of already collaborating community and academic partners, the COVID Care Corps (CCC), was developed to create and disseminate public health information to individuals in the Inland Empire (IE) by including community liaisons to implement a systematic feedback loop to assure community voice. Liaisons made disseminating information and getting community feedback more efficiently in a time of crisis when information needed to be immediate. As a result, it was found that although community was concerned about the pandemic, they also wanted information about other social determinants of health (immigration, finances, housing and job security= often presented as competing priorities to the pandemic. This resulted in a shift in content creation to aligned with community needs and interests. Establishing trust through community relationships and identifying community liaisons should be implemented prior to a crisis to ensure the quick dissemination of information needed for local buy-in and true equitable health communication.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Subnational tailoring of malaria interventions for strategic planning and prioritization: experience and perspectives of five malaria programs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 95%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 93%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 96%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 94%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 94%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.