A new approach to estimating HIV incidence and the size of the infected and undiagnosed population in high immigration settings
Kunkel, A.; Cazein, F.; Lot, F.; Muzzolon, J.; Pantazis, N.; Alioum, A.
Show abstract
Most current approaches to estimating HIV incidence and the size of the undiagnosed population do not account for pre-migration infections, although these represent a substantial fraction of new diagnoses in some European countries. We propose a new approach to estimating these indicators that explicitly accounts for migration. First, we use an existing Bayesian model to estimate delays between infection and diagnosis for each newly diagnosed individual, and classify those born abroad into pre- or post-migration infections. Second, for native-born individuals and those with post-migration infections, we use a repurposed regression model to describe the global distribution of delays between infection and diagnosis, and estimate HIV incidence. For people with pre-migration infections, the same model is used to describe the delays between migration and diagnosis, and subsequently estimate the number of arriving migrants with undiagnosed HIV. Finally, these estimates are combined to estimate the number of people in the country with undiagnosed HIV. When applied to simulated data inspired by the French HIV surveillance system, the new model appropriately corrects for pre-migration HIV infections and produces estimates of HIV incidence, arrival of people with undiagnosed HIV, and the size of the undiagnosed population that are similar to the true simulated values.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- HIV-phyloTSI: Subtype-independent estimation of time since HIV-1 infection for cross-sectional measures of population incidence using deep sequence data 95%
- Primary case inference in viral outbreaks through analysis of intra-host variant population 89%
- Unsupervised modeling of mutational landscapes of adeno-associated viruses viability 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.