Protocol for the development of reporting guidance for interest-holder engagement in practice guidelines: the RIGHT-MuSE checklist
Yu, X.; Estill, J.; Akl, E.; Khabsa, J.; Petkovic, J.; Zeidan, L.; Bian, Z.; Chen, Y.
Show abstract
IntroductionGuideline developers have increasingly engaged various groups of interest-holders in different stages of guideline development. However, reporting on interest-holder engagement in practice guidelines often lacks transparency. Therefore, the RIGHT (Reporting Items of Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) working group, in collaboration with the MuSE Consortium, plans to develop the RIGHT-MuSE extension. ObjectivesThis protocol aims to outline the steps for the detailed development of the RIGHT-MuSE checklist, as well as strategies for its effective development, dissemination, and application. MethodsWe will follow the methods recommended by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network, and build on the experience from the development of the original RIGHT statement and its extensions. The development process of RIGHT-MuSE will consist of twelve specific steps: 1. Identifying the need for the checklist; 2. Obtaining funding; 3. Drafting a protocol and registering the project; 4. Establishing the working groups; 5. Reviewing background work; 6. Generating an initial list of items; 7. Conducting consensus surveys; 8. Holding consensus meetings; 9. Drafting the final RIGHT-MuSE checklist; 10. Conducting a pilot test of the checklist; 11. Developing an explanatory document; and 12. Disseminating the checklist. DiscussionThe RIGHT-MuSE checklist will provide guideline developers with guidance for the systematic, scientific and transparent reporting of interest-holder engagement in practice guidelines. Additionally, developers and implementers of the RIGHT-MuSE checklist will use this protocol as a reference to ensure that the checklist they develop and implement adheres to the highest standards of transparency and quality. By promoting active and meaningful engagement of interest-holders, the RIGHT-MuSE checklist aims to foster inclusive and people centered processes in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Clinical practice competencies for standard critical care nursing: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey 94%
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 94%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 95%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- A prospective evaluation of inter-rater agreement of routine medical records audits at a large general hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.