Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus self-sampling in the Swedish cervical screening program
Ostensson, E.; Borgfeldt, C.; Pedersen, K.; Hellman, K.; Sy, S.; Lei, J.; Burger, E.; Clements, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn Sweden, the cervical cancer screening programme is based on primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with either clinician-collected cervical sampling or home-based vaginal self-sampling. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary HPV clinician-collected sampling and primary HPV self-collected sampling for unvaccinated cohorts of Swedish women. MethodsA model-based analysis was performed to project long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Screening strategies included no screening, 18 clinician-collected strategies and 36 self-sampling strategies, with variations in the screening frequency, start age and follow-up management. We estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios benchmarked against willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of {euro}50,000 and {euro}100,000 per QALY gained. ResultsCompared with the 2022 recommendations (with primary clinician-collected HPV testing from ages 23 with 5-yearly screening to age 50 and 7-yearly screening through to age 64), self-sampling at the same intensity would lead to similar effectiveness and a 36% reduction in costs. Among the clinician-collected sampling strategies, the optimal strategies involved primary HPV testing from age 25 with 10-yearly screening with extended genotyping (at {euro}50,000 per QALY gained), or 7- and 10-yearly screening for {euro}100,000. Across all strategies, the optimal strategies included primary self-sampling from age 25 with direct referral to colposcopy for HPV-16/18/45 with 7- and 10-yearly screening at {euro}50,000 per QALY gained, and 5- and 7-yearly screening for {euro}100,000 per QALY gained. These results were sensitive to the assumed accuracy of self-sampling compared with clinician-collected sampling. ConclusionsTransitioning from clinician-collected cervical sampling to vaginal HPV self-sampling is likely to be cost-effective for unvaccinated women in Sweden. Highlights- For an analysis restricted to clinician-collected sampling, the 2022 Swedish population-based recommendations (primary HPV testing from age 23 with 5-yearly screening to age 50 and 7-yearly screening between ages 50 and 64 years) were on the cost-efficiency frontier, however longer screening intervals were optimal. - For all of the considered strategies, the optimal strategies were primary vaginal self-sampling from age 25 years with direct referral to colposcopy for HPV 16, 18 and 45 with seven- and ten-yearly screening at {euro}50,000 per QALY gained, and with five- and seven-yearly screening at {euro}100,000 per QALY gained.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 91%
- Reasons for non-attendance to cervical cancer screening and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among Bruneian women: A cross-sectional study 91%
- Influence of follow-up, screening age, interval, and compliance on overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a modelling study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage 94%
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 90%
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 89%
- Safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and risk factors for hospitalisation caused by the omicron variant in 0.8 million adolescents: A nationwide cohort study in Sweden 89%
- Effect of Midwife-Led Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Prolapse Symptoms and Quality of Life in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ethiopia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modelled analysis of the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to HPV vaccination analysis 94%
- Cervical cancer screening improvements with self-sampling during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Health impacts of COVID-19 disruptions to primary cervical screening by time since last screen: A model-based analysis for current and future disruptions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected health and economic effects of nonavalent versus bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in preadolescence in the Netherlands 96%
- The indirect effect of the bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination program: an observational cohort study 93%
- Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.