Back

Competence of DNA Tetrahedron and Exosomes as Nanocarriers for Epirubicin drug delivery in Breast Cancer Cells

Saleem, A.; Saleeem, S.; Gani, U.; Shafi, N.; Vaswani, P.; Dhar, L. A.; Nazir, J.; Ahmad, S. F.; Ahmad, S. M.; Bhatia, D. D.

2025-02-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.02.11.637654 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epirubicin, a chemotherapeutic agent, is used in treatment of metastatic breast cancer treatment. However, poor intracellular delivery and systemic toxicity are its major limitations. Our study evaluates the use of DNA tetrahedron (TD) structures and exosomes for targeted delivery of epirubicin to enhance its therapeutic efficacy. Increased intracellular concentration of epirubicin was observed in Flow cytometer when delivered via the TD: Epi system compared to free epirubicin. Cell viability assays using Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide staining revealed higher apoptosis rates in the TD: Epi system. Exosomes, primarily 100 {+/-} 20 nm in size (99% of particles), exhibit a - 28.5 mV zeta potential, ensuring colloidal stability. SEM and TEM confirm their spherical shape, uniform size, and double membrane structure. The TD: Epi system showed the highest efficacy in RT-qPCR analysis, followed by Epirubicin + Exosomes systems and epirubicin alone, further corroborated with western blot results. While exosomes also provided improved delivery and therapeutic outcomes compared to free epirubicin, they were less effective than the TD: Epi system. These results suggest that the TD carrier significantly enhances the delivery and apoptotic efficacy of epirubicin when compared to exosome-based delivery or epirubicin alone offering a promising strategy for improving treatment outcomes. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=178 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/637654v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10e0393org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10ce3eeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@148552aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cf4664_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.