Back

Learning From the Past: Medical School Experiences Predict Meaning in Work and Imposter Phenomenon Among Residents

Carpenter, K. M.; Falco, C. M.; Menezes, S.; Diaz, J. B. B.; Wells, J. C.; Guldner, G.; Siegel, J. T.

2025-02-13 medical education
10.1101/2025.02.11.25322077 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionEndeavors to bolster resident well-being may benefit from a greater understanding of how associated psychological states are shaped across various stages of medical education. To this end, the current study aimed to determine if perceived psychological safety and exposure to negative aspects of the hidden curriculum during medical school predicted meaning in work and imposter phenomenon among medical residents transitioning into their new programs. MethodsAll incoming residents at a multi-institutional hospital organization were administered a survey link via email as part of a larger set of studies. Participants in this specific study (n = 237) completed measures assessing their perceptions of both positive and negative medical school experiences (i.e., psychological safety and hidden curriculum exposure) as well as their current feelings about themselves and their work (i.e., meaning in work and imposter phenomenon). Data collection took place during the summer of 2022. ResultsPerceptions of psychological safety during the last two years of medical school were positively related to meaning in work and negatively related to imposter phenomenon among incoming residents. Perceptions of exposure to negative aspects of the hidden curriculum predicted imposter phenomenon, but no link was observed between hidden curriculum exposure and meaning in work. DiscussionFeelings related to previous learning environments (i.e., medical school) may still be relevant during the transition into residency. Next steps include exploring potential causal linkages between these variables as well as expanding the scope and operationalization of psychological states and experiences considered across time points during the medical training journey.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.