Back

Population-specific Risk of Pharmacogenomics-related Inaccurate Drug Dosing of ICU Patients

Rostami, M. R.; Rodriguez-Flores, J. L.; Ait Hssain, A.; Al Shakaki, A.; Khan, H.; Vakayil, M.; Karic, E.; El Hamid, M.; Gamal Al Tawil, L.; Mezey, J. G.; Robay, A.; Crystal, R.

2025-02-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.11.25321889 medRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleIntensive care units (ICU) patients are highly vulnerable to inaccurate drug dosing. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) characterizes the influence of inherited genetic variation on drug metabolism, playing an important role in the consequences of a given drug dose. ObjectivesTo assess the genetic-based risk of inaccurate drug dosing in the ICU. MethodsWe carried out whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 210 Qataris in ICU care at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar and assessed the WGS for predicted deleterious variants of genes that metabolize 30 drugs commonly prescribed in the ICU. Measurements and Main ResultsAnalysis of 210 Qatari ICU WGS identified 329 variants predicted deleterious associated with 85 genes known to affect metabolism of the 30 ICU drugs. Of the ICU patients that received the 5 most commonly prescribed drugs (warfarin, phenytoin, midazolam, vancomycin, levetiracetam), 93% had deleterious metabolism-related variants. Most (91%) patients carried at least one variant in a gene that that had the potential to affect the metabolism or activity of at least 1 drug that the patient received. Most patients had [≥]14 deleterious variants of genes that affect the metabolism of administered drugs. Comparison of the deleterious variants related to metabolism of ICU drugs with African/African American and European populations revealed significant population specificity in ICU related PGx variants. ConclusionsTogether, these data suggest that population specific, pharmacogenomics based on the individuals genome likely plays a significant role in effective, safe dosing in the ICU setting.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
4
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
6
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
7
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
10
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
29
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
30
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%