Health needs assessment: knowing the psychological risks of frontline rescue workers for COVID-19 by simplified risk probability scale (SRPS)
Bo, Y.; Zhai, F.
Show abstract
Frontline rescue workers during the COVID-19 pandemic faced heightened psychological risks, yet existing tools like PHQ-9 and GAD-7 lack crisis-specific relevance and brevity. This study aimed to develop and validate a simplified risk probability scale (SRPS) tailored for rapid self-assessment of depression and anxiety in frontline rescue teams. A cross-sectional survey of 273 frontline workers in Lanzhou, China, was conducted using snowball sampling. Participants completed questionnaires integrating socio-economic, occupational, and psychological metrics, analyzed via univariate, multivariate, and ROC curve analyses. Key findings revealed middle-income earners (3000-4000 CNY/month) faced elevated depression risk [OR=3.666, 95%CI (1.085-12.385), p=0.036], while work stress intolerance strongly predicted anxiety [OR=14.258, 95%CI (4.213-58.983), p<0.001]. The SRPS demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy (depression AUC=0.572, sensitivity=58.2%, specificity=53.7%; anxiety AUC=0.662, sensitivity=72.5%, specificity=64.8%)] but prioritized brevity (10 items) and contextual relevance over diagnostic precision. The tools integration into mobile health platforms offers real-time screening potential, enabling targeted interventions for high-risk groups. This study highlights the necessity of context-specific mental health tools in crisis settings and provides a foundation for scalable, dynamic risk assessment in future public health emergencies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 98%
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 96%
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 95%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 97%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 96%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 97%
- Prevalence of Social Anxiety Disorder and its associated factors among Foreign-born Undergraduate Students in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study 95%
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health and Stress Level of Ukrainians Seeking Psychological Help Online 95%
- Association of alcohol consumption and frequency with loneliness: A cross-sectional study among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.