Olfactory preferences and chemical differences of fruit scents for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
Leon-Norena, M.; Tauxe, G. M.; Riffell, J. A.
Show abstract
Feeding on the sugar of fruits and flowers is vital for mosquitoes and increases their lifespan, reproduction, and flight activity. Olfaction is a key sensory modality in mediating mosquito responses to sugar sources. Previous studies have demonstrated that natural nectar sources from fruits and flowers can vary in attractiveness to mosquitoes, with some sources preferred over others. However, how the attractiveness of different fruits relates to the chemical composition of their scent and the responses they evoke from the mosquitos peripheral olfactory system, is still not understood. In this study, we use closely related fruit species and their varieties to examine how changes in scent chemistry can influence the fruits attractiveness to Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and examine how the mosquitos olfactory responses (via electroantennogram recordings, or EAG) correlate with those differences. Our results show that mosquitoes are attracted to the scents of certain fruits (Mangifera indica, Prunus perspica, Psidium guajava, Musa acuminata), whereas others (Pyrus communis, Citrus limon) elicited responses not significantly different from the negative control. Chemical analyses of the scents showed that attractive fruits have distinct chemical profiles, and amongst closely related fruits, minor changes in the relative proportions of scent compounds can modify the attractiveness. These minor differences in the fruit scent were not reflected in the EAG responses, which showed similar responses to scents from different fruit species and closely related varieties. Experimentally altering the chemical proportion of a single compound in attractive scents caused a significant decrease in attraction to levels similar to the less attractive cultivars. Our results demonstrate that mosquitoes are sensitive to compound proportions in attractive odors, which have implications for the olfactory processing of complex odor sources, like those from plants or blood hosts. Summary StatementAedes aegypti mosquitoes show specific and selective fruit scent preferences related to differences in the proportion of compounds in the scent.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sugar-feeding by invasive mosquito species on ornamental and wild plants 97%
- Optokinetic response in D. Melanogaster reveals the nature of common repellent odorants. 95%
- Impact of Cymbopogon flexuosus (Poaceae) essential oil and primary components on the eclosion and larval development of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- (3S,6E)-Nerolidol-mediated rendezvous of Cyclocephalini beetles, Cyclocephala paraguayensis, in bottle gourd flowers 96%
- Hyperbolic odorant mixtures as a basis for more efficient signaling between flowering plants and bees 95%
- Odorant receptors for floral- and plant-derived volatiles in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contact toxicity, antifeedant activity and oviposition preference of osthole against agricultural pests 94%
- Volatile organic compounds from entomopathogenic and nematophagous fungi, repel banana black weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) 94%
- Differential coding of fruit, leaf, and microbial odours in the brains of Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cheese or cheese infusions - Ecological traps for mosquitoes and spotted wing Drosophila 95%
- Larvicidal activity of the photosensitive insecticides, methylene blue and rose bengal, in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes 93%
- Characterisation of aphid antixenosis in aphid-resistant ancestor wheat, Triticum monococcum 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.