Smartphone-based measures as real-world indicators of functional status in advanced cancer patients
Straczkiewicz, M.; Keating, N. L.; Schonholz, S. M.; Matulonis, U. A.; Horowitz, N.; Campos, S.; Onnela, J.-P.; Wright, A. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study evaluated the feasibility of using smartphone-based metrics to monitor physical functioning and quality of life in patients with advanced gynecological cancers. We analyzed associations between gait (step count, cadence, stride acceleration) and measures of mobility (home time, distance traveled, number of significant locations visited) with patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). MethodsWe studied raw accelerometer and GPS data from smartphones over 180-days for 85 patients with advanced gynecologic cancers. We computed measures of gait and mobility from smartphone sensor data, and PROMs (performance status, health-related quality of life, physical functioning) from smartphone surveys at baseline, 30, 90, and 180 days. We assessed longitudinal associations of digital gait and mobility measures with PROMs using linear mixed-effects models, with attention to smartphone adherence and temporal trends. ResultsSmartphone adherence was high: 83% of participants reported daily smartphone usage >1 hour; 74.1% had >16 hours of daily use. Gait measures, particularly step count and stride acceleration, were statistically associated with PROMs. Worsening patient-reported ECOG performance status corresponded to reduced step count (ECOG 3 vs. 0: -1837 steps/day, p<0.001), while higher PROMIS Physical Function was associated with step count increase (+72.64 steps/day per one-point increase, p<0.001). Mobility measures were less strongly associated with PROMs but provided complementary insights into patients behavioral patterns. ConclusionSmartphone-based gait and mobility metrics offer robust, real-world insights into individuals health statuses, providing a scalable, low-burden alternative to wearable devices. The high levels of smartphone use among participants underscore the feasibility of integrating this technology into routine oncology care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 95%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 93%
- Integrating remote monitoring into heart failure patients’ care regimen: A pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the Burden of Influenza on Daily Activity at Population Scale Using Commercial Wearable Sensors 90%
- If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative 90%
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 94%
- Cohort Profile: Baseline characteristics and design of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility (MacM3) Study, a prospective digital mobility cohort of community-dwelling older Canadians from Southern Ontario 93%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.