Back

CUT&Tag Identifies Repetitive Genomic Loci that are Excluded from ChIP Assays

Park, B. J.; Hua, S.; Casler, K. D.; Cefaloni, E.; Ayers, M. C.; Lake, R. F.; Murphy, K. E.; Vertino, P. M.; O'Connell, M. R.; Murphy, P. J.

2025-02-05 genomics
10.1101/2025.02.03.636299 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining the genomic localization of chromatin features is an essential aspect of investigating gene expression control, and ChIP-Seq has long been the gold standard technique for interrogating chromatin landscapes. Recently, the development of alternative methods, such as CUT&Tag, have provided researchers with alternative strategies that eliminate the need for chromatin purification, and allow for in situ investigation of histone modifications and chromatin bound factors. Mindful of technical differences, we set out to investigate whether distinct chromatin modifications were equally compatible with these different chromatin interrogation techniques. We found that ChIP-Seq and CUT&Tag performed similarly for modifications known to reside at gene regulatory regions, such as promoters and enhancers, but major differences were observed when we assessed enrichment over heterochromatin-associated loci. Unlike ChIP-Seq, CUT&Tag detects robust levels of H3K9me3 at a substantial number of repetitive elements, with especially high sensitivity over evolutionarily young retrotransposons. IAPEz-int elements for example, exhibited underrepresentation in mouse ChIP-Seq datasets but strong enrichment using CUT&Tag. Additionally, we identified several euchromatin-associated proteins that co-purify with repetitive loci and are similarly depleted when applying ChIP-based methods. This study reveals that our current knowledge of chromatin states across the heterochromatin portions of the mammalian genome is extensively incomplete, largely due to limitations of ChIP-Seq. We also demonstrate that newer in situ chromatin fragmentation-based techniques, such as CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN, are more suitable for studying chromatin modifications over repetitive elements and retrotransposons. HighlightsIn situ fragmentation overcomes biases produced by ChIP-Seq. Heterochromatic regions of the genome are lost to the insoluble pellet during ChIP-Seq. CUT&Tag allows for mapping chromatin features at young repetitive elements. Euchromatin-associated regulatory factors co-purify with insoluble heterochromatin.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.6%
2
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
9
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Chromosoma
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%