Back

Time-course responses following sports-related concussion: A multi-modality study.

Pearce, A. J.; Middleton, K.; Clarke, A.

2025-02-03 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.02.02.25321562 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesUsing a repeated-measures design, we investigated reported symptoms, oculomotor, and neurophysiological responses for up to 26 days following a sports-related concussion. MethodsOver the course of one season, 115 athletes (mean age 26.2 {+/-} 5.4 years) from one football team (f=28, m=37) and one ice hockey team (f=21, m=29) were assessed for self-reported symptoms and severity of symptoms, cognitive testing for 10-word recall and digit backwards. Oculomotor performance was assessed using eye-pursuits. Neurophysiology was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Baseline data was tested during pre-season for all athletes and, when a concussion was identified, carried out at 48h, 12-, 19-, and 26-days post injury. ResultsTwenty-two players suffered concussion injuries (f=10, m=12). Significant increases in symptoms were reported at 48-hours (p<0.001) and 12-days (p=0.017). Severity of symptoms were significantly increased at 48-hours only (p=0.002). Significant decrements in performance for 10-word recall (p=0.003), digit backwards (p=0.011), and eye-pursuit (p=0.009) were observed at 48-hours in comparison to baseline. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed significantly increased cortical inhibition at 48-hours (p=0.024), 12- (p=0.009), and 19-days (p=0.028) compared to baseline. No differences were seen between females and males for any variables or timepoints. ConclusionConcussed players show acute changes in cortical inhibition, resolving by 26-days after injury, which follows a longer time-course for recovery compared to symptoms, cognitive tests, and oculomotor eye-pursuits. These results suggest that measuring the recovery of concussed athletes should incorporate a range of testing modalities in the determination of a players readiness to return to play.

Published in The Physician and Sportsmedicine · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.