Examining gender and ethnic disparities in scientific authorship to promote a culture of equity, diversity and inclusion at a university school of public health
Christen, P.; Michalow, J.; Naidoo, T.; Topazian, H.; van Elsland, S.; Arif, A. M.; Baguelin, M.; Clunie, G.; Essilfie-Quaye, S.; Fecht, D.; Garske, T.; Hassounah, S.; Husbands, J.; Kwok, W.; Leuba, S.; McCormack, C.; Mitchell, K. M.; Pianella, M.; Pickles, M.; Ruybal-Pesantez, S.; Schmit, N.; Udeh-Momoh, C.; Cori, A.; Blake, I. M.; Okell, L. C.
Show abstract
While fostering equity, diversity, and inclusion in the workplace is crucial for many reasons, in public health research, diverse perspectives are particularly vital to identify biases that homogenous teams might miss. Given that publication metrics often influence career progression, we investigated gender and ethnic disparities in publication rates within Imperial College Londons School of Public Health. We analysed 18,322 peer-reviewed publications by 513 affiliated researchers between 2014 and 2023. We used mixed-effects multivariable regression models to assess the impact of gender, ethnicity, and job level on publication rates. Network analysis of co-authorships was performed to evaluate each authors centrality in the departments research network. We found a persistent gender gap in publication rates across all job levels and ethnicities, with men publishing more than women (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.30 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.15 - 1.46). This disparity was present from early career levels and amplified in senior roles, where men were overrepresented (71.2% of men at Professor level). Internal collaboration rates were similar between genders. Unadjusted analyses indicated higher publication rates for white researchers (median of 1 publication more per person per year), although there were limitations in the ethnicity classification algorithm. The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased publication rates for both genders, but the gender gap persisted, with men publishing 1.27 (95% CI: 1.10 - 1.46) times more than women in 2020 - 2021. A complex interplay of factors may contribute to publication disparities, including differences in research contributions, systemic barriers, and potential biases in research allocation, mentorship, and promotion processes. This study underscores the need to identify and address the root causes of these disparities to foster an inclusive research environment where diverse contributions are recognized and valued.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open-access publishing each year 96%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 91%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- College campuses and COVID-19 mitigation: clinical and economic value 88%
- Assessing COVID prevention strategies to permit the safe opening of college campuses in fall 2021 87%
- Quantification of occupational and community risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers in a large U.S. healthcare system 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 91%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 91%
- Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.