TSC1 mRNA processing alterations in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) patients with negative or inconclusive genetic testing results
Bandeira de Mello Garcia, A.; da Silveira Fischer, T.; de Freitas Pinho, M. C.; Fernandes Jatai, L.; Santos da Silva, P.; Finger Andreis, T.; Brussa Reis, L.; Brinckmann Oliveira Netto, C.; Ashton Prolla, P.; Rosset, C.
Show abstract
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by the presence of pathogenic germline variants in TSC1 or TSC2 genes. However, most TSC1 and TSC2 genetic testing strategies are limited and about 20% of patients have inconclusive or negative results. In this study, we standardized a low-cost technique based on RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, aimed to complement genetic testing strategies. Patients with clinical suspicion of TSC and TSC1 and TSC2 inconclusive (n=3) or negative (n=1) genetic testing results were recruited. Exon 5 skipping in TSC1 gene was identified in one patient with a previous negative genetic testing result. In addition, a 9-base-pair intronic inclusion was found in the TSC1 of an individual with a previously identified variant of uncertain significance, c.664-10A>C. No alterations were found in the other two patients. The present study was successful in identifying errors in mRNA processing in two TSC patients with previously negative or inconclusive genetic testing results. Furthermore, this strategy was useful to reclassify a VUS to pathogenic. Finally, the validated technique could be used to complement coding region genetic tests and to investigate causality of VUS in TSC and other monogenic diseases. Highlights- A novel cDNA analysis method revealed the presence of exon 5 skipping in the - TSC1 gene - A nine-base-pair retention in TSC1 mRNA is caused by the intronic variant c.664-10A>C - The variant of uncertain significance c.664-10A>C in TSC1 was reclassified as pathogenic - A strategy using cDNA could be a good complement to conventional molecular diagnosis protocols
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in splicing defects between the grey and white matter in myotonic dystrophy type 1 94%
- New genes involved in Angelman syndrome-like: expanding the genetic spectrum 93%
- Mutation analysis of multiple pilomatricomas in a patient with myotonic dystrophy type 1 suggests a DM1-associated hypermutation phenotype 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of optical genome mapping in clinical genetic testing of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 93%
- Structural variability, expression profile and pharmacogenetics properties of TMPRSS2 gene as a potential target for COVID-19 therapy 91%
- A novel co-segregating DCTN1 splice site variant in a family with Bipolar Disorder may hold the key to understanding the etiology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous group of genetically determined auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders 93%
- Molecular genetics of GLUT1DS Italian pediatric cohort: 10 novel related-disease variants and structural analysis 93%
- Identification of ATP2B4 regulatory element containing functional genetic variants associated with severe malaria 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Insight into Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in Indian patients reveals novel mutations in FLCN 92%
- Clinical, biochemical and molecular analysis in a cohort of individuals with gyrate atrophy 91%
- MLC1 alteration in iPSCs give rise to disease-like cellular vacuolation phenotype in the astrocyte lineage 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type II Alexander disease caused by splicing errors and aberrant overexpression of an uncharacterized GFAP isoform. 93%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 92%
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.