Back

Impact of NIHSS and Onset-to-Angiography Time on Neurological Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Thrombectomy

Lin, K.-M.; Lu, S.-Y.; Shih, H. M.; Hsu, T.-Y.; Huang, F.-W.; Wu, S.-H.; Tsai, S.-T.; Liu, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-H.

2025-02-02 emergency medicine
10.1101/2025.01.29.25321366 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAcute ischemic stroke is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent intervention. For patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), timely endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is critical. This retrospective observational study investigates the impact of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and onset-to-angiography time (OAT) on one-month neurological outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. MethodsA total of 300 acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO who underwent EVT at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan from Jan. 2015 to Dec. 2018 were included. The NIHSS-time score was calculated by multiplying the pre-EVT NIHSS score by OAT. Favorable outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [&le;] 2 at one month. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the association between NIHSS-time scores and outcomes, adjusting for confounders. ResultsPatients with a NIHSS-time score < 4093 had significantly higher odds of achieving favorable outcomes (adjusted OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.56-5.56, p < 0.001). This highlights the importance of early EVT and initial stroke severity assessment in predicting recovery. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that lower NIHSS-time scores are strongly associated with favorable neurological outcomes. Patients with a NIHSS-time score less than 4093 had a significantly higher ratio of favorable neurological function after one month. The NIHSS-time score offers a practical tool for prognostic evaluation, emphasizing the urgency of EVT in acute ischemic stroke patients. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore their generalizability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.