Back

Diet links gut chemistry with cancer risk in C57Bl/6 mice and human colorectal cancer patients

Cohen, Z.; Choi, J.; Peregrina, K.; Khan, S.; Wolfson, S.; Sherman, C.; Augenlicht, L. H.; Kelly, L.

2025-01-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.01.27.635083 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsWestern-style diets, characterized by higher fat and protein, and low micronutrient levels, promote the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we investigate the role of a Western diet on microbiome composition, sulfide production, and intestinal epithelial damage in pre-CRC mice, and validate taxonomic changes in a meta-analysis of human CRC patients. MethodsNWD1 is a purified Western-style diet that produces sporadic intestinal and colon tumors in wild-type C57BL/6 mice in the absence of genetic or carcinogen exposure. To determine how this diet influences cancer risk by shaping microbial composition and sulfide chemistry, mice were fed NWD1 or a purified control diet for 24 weeks. Microbiome composition, sulfide production, and intestinal stem cell mRNA expression were assessed. Observed microbiome changes were validated in a human CRC meta-analysis. ResultsFecal sulfide levels were tripled in NWD1-fed mice (P< 0.00001), concurrent with increased abundance of the sulfidogenic Erysipelotrichaceae family. NWD1-fed mice had increased expression of mitochondrial sulfide oxidation genes in Lgr5hi intestinal stem cells, demonstrating an adaptive response to elevated sulfide. In a meta-analysis of human CRC studies, we observed that Erysipelotrichaceae were associated with CRC, validating both canonical CRC microbes such as Solobacterium moorei and highlighting the potential contribution of previously unrecognized, disease-associated microbes. ConclusionsOur analyses connect the risk factors of Western diet, sulfide, and epithelial damage in a pre-cancer mouse model to microbiome changes observed in human CRC patients and suggest that microbial signatures of CRC and gut ecosystem alteration may manifest long before disease development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.