Exploring booster session attendance, prescription, and outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Lanier, V. M.; Lohse, K. R.; Hooker, Q. L.; Civello, J. M.; van Dillen, L. R.
Show abstract
IntroductionBooster sessions are a potential method for maintaining self-management behaviors and treatment effects in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have examined booster prescription or outcomes in people with LBP. Objective(1) Compare booster prescription for two exercise-based treatments for low back pain (LBP) in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) where the number of boosters prescribed was based on self-management program independence, (2) Determine if there are variables that predict who will require >1 booster, (3) Explore the effects of boosters on pain and function in people who required >1 booster. DesignSecondary analysis of a RCT in which participants were randomized to motor skill training (MST), MST+Boosters (MST+B), strength and flexibility exercise (SFE), or SFE+B. SettingAcademic research setting. Participants76 participants with chronic LBP assigned to receive boosters. InterventionsThis secondary analysis focuses only on the MST+B and SFE+B groups. Both groups received 6 visits of MST or SFE and six months later received up to 3 boosters. The number of boosters was based on self-management program independence at the first booster. Those who required >1 booster were not able to independently perform their program at the first booster. Main Outcome MeasuresBooster attendance and prescription, pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), function (modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire) ResultsThere was not a significant difference between MST+B and SFE+B in returning for the initial booster, {chi}2(1)=1.76, p=0.185. SFE+B were more likely to require >1 booster than MST+B; {beta}=2.39, p<0.001. No participant-specific factors we examined were statistically related to needing >1 booster. ConclusionMST+B participants were less likely to require additional boosters. No additional participant-specific factors we examined were associated with needing additional boosters. Qualitatively, attending additional booster sessions did not appear to change pain or function in the current sample.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 95%
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 94%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 95%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 94%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 91%
- Multidimensional analysis of the clinical spectrum and symptom burden of unexplained myofascial pain 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 94%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individualised exercise in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis on the effects of exercise alone or in combination with psychological interventions on pain and disability 94%
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 94%
- Low somatosensory cortex excitability in the acute stage of low back pain causes chronic pain 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.