Prevalence of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy using early, standard and late screening: a study in the Primary Care Health in Lima, Peru
Seclen, S. N.; Damas-Casani, L. N. A.; Motta-Montoya, V. D. C.; Jimenez-Martel, S. L.; Yovera-Aldana, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) based on the timing of screening in pregnant women. Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women recruited from February 2019 to August 2022 in four primary care centers in Lima, excluding those with known diabetes. Screening involved an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test with 75 g of glucose at the first contact. It was classified as early if performed before 24 weeks, standard between 24-28 weeks, and late if after 29 weeks. For gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we used the IADPSG diagnostic criteria for any gestational age. For diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), glucose levels over 126 mg/dl fasting or over 200 mg/dl at 2 hours post-load were used. We calculated prevalence ratios for GDM and DIP based on the type of screening. ResultsWe included 4,495 pregnant women with an average age of 29 years. The prevalence of HIP was 14.9%, GDM was 14.2%, and DIP was 0.7%. Early GDM screening showed a 23% higher prevalence compared to GDM screening at 24-28 weeks, adjusted for age (PR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.49; p=0.036). No differences were found for DIP across screening types. ConclusionIn pregnant women at four primary centers in Lima, one in seven pregnant women (14.9%) had HIP, GDM was 14.2%, and DIP was 0.7%.. Early screening showed the highest proportion of GDM compared to standard or late screening. Longitudinal studies are needed to validate whether this higher early prevalence impacts maternal-perinatal complications.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of parental anthropometry and gestational weight gain on intrauterine growth and neonatal outcomes: Findings from the MAI cohort study in rural India 94%
- Prevalence of, and risk factors for, diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh: Evidence from the national survey using a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance 94%
- Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and its association with glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early postpartum HbA1c after hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy - imperfect but not without value 96%
- Determinants of glycemic control among persons living with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a district hospital in Ghana 96%
- Predictors of glycemic control, quality of life and diabetes self-management of patients with diabetes mellitus at a tertiary hospital in Ghana 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Relationship Between Clinical Profile, Glycemic Parameters And Hypoglycemia In Type 1 Diabetes Pediatric Patients 95%
- Polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility loci inform disease etiological heterogeneity 92%
- Exploring the Association Between Urinary Incontinence and Depression Based on a Series of Large-Scale National Health Studies in Turkiye 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study for the assessment of sarcopenia in gestational diabetes: The SiGnal-D study 96%
- Cohort profile: The Nanjing Diabetes Cohort database – a population-based surveillance cohort 94%
- Prevalence Of Abdominal Obesity And Its Association With Cardiovascular Risk Among The Adult Population In Burkina Faso 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time In Range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes– A systemic review 94%
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 93%
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.