Antimullerian Hormone Levels by Phenotypes in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Carvalho, P.; Maffazioli, G.; Simoes, R.; Macchioni, R.; de Medeiros, S.; Soares-Jr, J. M.; Baracat, E.; Maciel, G. A. R.
Show abstract
Structured abstractO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSThis study aims to evaluate antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels across Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes (A, B, C, D) based on the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria. Data SourcesA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2009 and June 2024. Study Eligibility CriteriaStudies reporting AMH levels stratified by PCOS phenotypes based on the Rotterdam criteria, along with population characteristics and AMH measurement methods, were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports, opinion articles, letters to the editor, other non-original research. and those lacking complete phenotype stratification were excluded. Study Appraisal and Synthesis MethodsStudy quality was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. Primary outcomes included mean AMH levels across phenotypes, analyzed as tAMH (without assay differentiation) and bcAMH (Beckman Coulter Gen II assay). Secondary outcomes included age and BMI by phenotype. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate mean levels and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I{superscript 2} statistic. ResultsForty-nine studies involving 15,535 subjects revealed that AMH levels vary significantly by phenotype, being highest in A, followed by D, C, and B. For phenotype A: tAMH=9.87 ng/mL (SMD 2.97, CI 9.29-10.48); bcAMH=11.49 ng/mL (SMD 3.06, CI 10.47-12.61). For phenotype B: tAMH=5.71 ng/mL (SMD 0.98, CI 4.96-6.57); bcAMH=6.25 ng/mL (SMD 1.36, CI 5.20-7.51). There were no significant differences in age or BMI among phenotypes. High heterogeneity suggests additional factors influence AMH levels beyond phenotypic categories. ConclusionsAMH levels are elevated in PCOS and vary across phenotypes, underscoring their potential to improve PCOS subtype characterization and guide management strategies. The findings highlight the need for standardizing AMH measurement techniques for consistent clinical application.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Both general- and central- obesity are causally associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome: Findings of a Mendelian randomization study 95%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 95%
- Effects of electroacupuncture on the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y and ghrelin in pubertal rats with polycystic ovary syndrome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ovarian follicular function is not altered by SARS-Cov-2 infection or BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination 94%
- Stratifying IVF population endometria using a prognosis gradient independent of endometrial timing. 93%
- The effect of the menstrual cycle on the circulating microRNA pool in human plasma: a pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sitagliptin decreases visceral fat and blood glucose in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome 93%
- Testicular microvascular flow is altered in Klinefelter syndrome and predicts circulating testosterone 93%
- A polygenic and phenotypic risk prediction for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome evaluated by Phenome-wide association studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility loci inform disease etiological heterogeneity 95%
- Medroxyprogesterone reverses tolerable dose metformin-induced inhibition of invasion via matrix metallopeptidase-9 and transforming growth factor-β1 in KLE endometrial cancer cells 93%
- Proton pump inhibitors use and risk of preeclampsia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.