Back

Artificial Intelligence Generated Computed Tomography Segmentation of Thoracoabdominal Aorta

Chatterjee, D.; Obey, N. T.; Shou, B.; Singh, S.; Acuna Higaki, A. R.; Ahmed, A.; Erez, E.; Cupo, M.; Price, N.; Hameed, I.; Schneider, E. B.; Vallabhajosyula, P.; Ong, C. S.

2025-01-14 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.01.13.25320502
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe rising global burden of cardiovascular diseases (CV) highlights the critical need for efficiency in disease diagnosis and management. An important area for such improvement is utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) for streamlining time and resources in CV imaging workflow. We evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation for aortic segmentation on clinical computed tomography angiography (CTA) images and compare accuracy to manual methods. Such automation would markedly improve efficiency and accuracy of aortic surveillance. MethodsThis retrospective study included 27 scans from 20 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) between January 2020 and March 2022. An open-source AI model was applied to segment the aorta, and its performance was assessed by comparing AI-generated segmentations with manual segmentations using Dice similarity coefficients, volumetric analysis, and aortic dimensions. Centerline reconstructed images of thoracoabdominal aorta were processed to extract radiomic features, including maximum diameter and cross-sectional area, for analysis. ResultsThe AI tool achieved a median Dice coefficient of 0.96 (0.02), indicating a high degree of concordance with manual segmentation. Multiplanar reconstruction was performed to visualize the aorta and extract measurements along its length using the automated centerline, and radiomic features, including maximum diameter and cross-sectional area, were subsequently extracted for analysis. ConclusionsAI segmentation demonstrates strong potential for improving efficiency and consistency in thoracoabdominal aortic segmentation, achieving high accuracy compared to manual methods. These findings highlight the feasibility of AI integration into clinical practice for diagnosis and surveillance of aortopathies, warranting further validation on larger datasets to enable clinical translation. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25320502v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d00e80org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@167fd18org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1972faorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cb96d5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
7.3%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 0.5%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 25%
7.3%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 4%
7.3%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
7.3%
6
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 5%
4.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.4%
8
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
9
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1.0%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 81%
2.7%
11
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 1.0%
2.2%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
2.2%
15
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
16
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 37%
2.2%
17
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
18
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
22
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 25%
1.2%
23
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
26
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
27
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
28
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
29
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%