Back

Accurate inference methods based on the estimating equation theory for the modified Poisson and least-squares regressions

Noma, H.; Gosho, M.

2025-01-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.01.10.25320320 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesIn clinical and epidemiological studies, the modified Poisson and least-squares regression analyses for binary outcomes have been used as standard multivariate analysis methods to provide risk ratio and risk difference estimates. However, their ordinary Wald-type confidence intervals can suffer from finite-sample biases in the robust variance estimators, and the coverage probabilities of true effect measures are substantially below the nominal level (usually 95%). To address this issue, new accurate inference methods are needed. MethodsWe propose two accurate inference methods based on the estimating equation theory for these regression models. A remarkable advantage of these regression models is that the correct models to be estimated are known, that is, conventional binomial regression models with log and identity links. Using this modeling information, we first derive the quasi-score statistics, whose robust variances are estimated using the correct model information, and then propose a confidence interval based on the regression coefficient test using{chi} 2 -approximation. To further improve the large sample approximation, we propose adapting a parametric bootstrap method to estimate the sample distribution of the quasi-score statistics using the correct model information. In addition, we developed an R package, rqlm (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.rqlm), that can implement the new methods via simple commands. ResultsIn extensive simulation studies, the coverage probabilities of the two new methods clearly outperformed the ordinary Wald-type confidence interval when the regression function assumptions were correctly specified, especially in small and moderate sample settings. We also illustrated the proposed methods by applying them to an epidemiological study of epilepsy. The proposed methods provided wider confidence intervals, reflecting statistical uncertainty. ConclusionsThe current standard Wald-type confidence intervals may provide misleading evidence. Erroneous evidence can potentially influence clinical practice, public health, and policymaking. These possibly inaccurate results should be circumvented using effective statistical methods. These new inference methods would provide more accurate evidence for future medical studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
3
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%