Accurate inference methods based on the estimating equation theory for the modified Poisson and least-squares regressions
Noma, H.; Gosho, M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesIn clinical and epidemiological studies, the modified Poisson and least-squares regression analyses for binary outcomes have been used as standard multivariate analysis methods to provide risk ratio and risk difference estimates. However, their ordinary Wald-type confidence intervals can suffer from finite-sample biases in the robust variance estimators, and the coverage probabilities of true effect measures are substantially below the nominal level (usually 95%). To address this issue, new accurate inference methods are needed. MethodsWe propose two accurate inference methods based on the estimating equation theory for these regression models. A remarkable advantage of these regression models is that the correct models to be estimated are known, that is, conventional binomial regression models with log and identity links. Using this modeling information, we first derive the quasi-score statistics, whose robust variances are estimated using the correct model information, and then propose a confidence interval based on the regression coefficient test using{chi} 2 -approximation. To further improve the large sample approximation, we propose adapting a parametric bootstrap method to estimate the sample distribution of the quasi-score statistics using the correct model information. In addition, we developed an R package, rqlm (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.rqlm), that can implement the new methods via simple commands. ResultsIn extensive simulation studies, the coverage probabilities of the two new methods clearly outperformed the ordinary Wald-type confidence interval when the regression function assumptions were correctly specified, especially in small and moderate sample settings. We also illustrated the proposed methods by applying them to an epidemiological study of epilepsy. The proposed methods provided wider confidence intervals, reflecting statistical uncertainty. ConclusionsThe current standard Wald-type confidence intervals may provide misleading evidence. Erroneous evidence can potentially influence clinical practice, public health, and policymaking. These possibly inaccurate results should be circumvented using effective statistical methods. These new inference methods would provide more accurate evidence for future medical studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 96%
- A robust and fast two-sample test of equal correlations with an application to differential co-expression 94%
- Using generalized additive models to analyze biomedical non-linear longitudinal data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Stage Multivariate Mendelian Randomization on Multiple Outcomes with Mixed Distributions 96%
- Tight Fit of the SIR Dynamic Epidemic Model to Daily Cases of COVID-19 Reported During the 2021-2022 Omicron Surge in New York City: A Novel Approach 93%
- Health Utility Adjusted Survival: a Composite Endpoint for Clinical Trial Designs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 94%
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 93%
- A Flexible Framework for Local-Level Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number in Geographic Regions with Sparse Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.