Back

Prognostic and Diagnostic Utility of Heart Rate Variability to Predict and Understand Change in Cancer and Chemotherapy Related Fatigue, Pain, and Neuropathic Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Bolanos, J. L.; Hneiny, L.; Gonzalez, J. P.; O'Malley, M. E.; Wong, M. L.

2025-01-08 oncology
10.1101/2025.01.08.25320191 medRxiv
Show abstract

Advances in early cancer detection and treatment have significantly improved survival rates, resulting in over 18.1 million cancer survivors in the United States. Many of these survivors experience chronic pain, fatigue, and neuropathic symptoms related to cancer or its treatments. Emerging evidence suggests that autonomic nervous system dysfunction plays a crucial role in these symptoms. Heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of autonomic function, has shown potential in predicting the onset of somatic symptoms in cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to assess the association of HRV with pain, fatigue, and neuropathy in cancer patients and survivors. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding 19 studies that met inclusion criteria. These studies varied in cancer types, stages, and HRV measurement methods. Most studies focused on breast cancer and reported a predominant female population. Fatigue was the most studied symptom, followed by pain. HRV measures included both time and frequency domain variables, with significant variability in measurement duration and control for confounding factors. Findings suggest that decreased HRV is associated with increased fatigue and pain, providing potential support for a bidirectional relationship between autonomic dysfunction and these symptoms. However, the heterogeneity in HRV measurement methods and the high risk of bias in many studies highlight the need for standardized HRV protocols in cancer research. Further large-scale studies with low risk of bias are necessary to validate HRV as a reliable tool for phenotyping and managing cancer-related symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.2%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
8
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%