Back

Regulation of eye movements and pupil size in natural scenes

Hahn, A.; Brielmann, A.; Tabandeh, N.; Spitschan, M.

2025-01-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.06.631507 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The visual diet of humans is complex in space, time, spectrum, and conse- quently the activation of the retinal photoreceptors. While analyses of natural scenes have yielded valuable insights, the naturalistic natural stimulus on the retina is not very well understood. In the present study, we performed eye tracking in naturalistic indoor and outdoor real-world scenes. We recorded pupil size, several saccade and fixation metrics, as well as subjective scene perception ratings derived from subjective questionnaires. For the first five seconds of eye tracking, the descriptive data analysis revealed significantly increased average saccade frequency (p =.0025), amplitude (p =.0049), peak velocity (p =.0072), as well as pupil size (p = 1.307e-09) in the indoor environ- ments. After this initial phase, these differences vanished, except for pupil size. Using an exploratory analysis on the whole 4-minute measurement, we found that saccade and fixation metrics, along with scene ratings, showed significantly different correlations between indoor and outdoor conditions. Despite the inherent constraints of such a naturalistic study (reduced ability to exert control over the precise task and the environmental conditions), we contend that the dataset holds substantial value for field of eye movement research, as it has effectively minimized confounding factors that have been prevalent in previous eye tracking studies. HighlightsO_LIIncreased amplitude, frequency, and peak velocity of saccades in real- world indoor environments within the initial 5 seconds of eye tracking C_LIO_LIDifferent correlations of eye movement metrics and subjective scene per- ception between real-world indoor and outdoor environments C_LIO_LIEstablishing an eye movement dataset of various saccade in fixation metrics in naturalistic real-world environments with reduced confounding factors C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
3
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
5
Vision Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
7
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Journal of Biological Rhythms
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.5%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%