Race and ethnic disparities in rehabilitation services and functional recovery post-stroke
Bishop, L.; Gardener, H.; Brown, S. C.; Veledar, E.; Johnson, K. H.; Marulanda-Londono, E. T.; Gutierrez, C. M.; Kirk-Sanchez, N.; Romano, J. G.; Rundek, T.
Show abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSTo identify race/ethnic disparities in rehabilitation services after stroke and characterize the independent associations of each of race/ethnicity and rehabilitation to functional recovery post-stroke. MethodsThe Transitions of Care Stroke Disparities Study (TCSD-S) is a prospective cohort study designed to reduce disparities and to optimize the transitions of care for stroke survivors throughout the state of Florida. Participant characteristics were extracted from the American Heart Associations Get-With-The-Guidelines-Stroke dataset. Rehabilitation services, and modified Rankin Scale were recorded via follow up phone calls at 30- and 90-days after hospital discharge. Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to determine: 1) race/ethnic differences in rehabilitation services received; 2) race/ethnic differences in functional change from discharge to 30- and 90-days, respectively; and 3) the influence of rehabilitation on functional change from discharge to 30- and 90-days. ResultsOf 1,083 individuals, 43% were female, 52% were Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 22% were Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and were 22% Hispanic. Individuals who engaged in rehabilitation were more likely to show improvements [aOR=1.820, 95%CI (1.301,2.545)] at 90-days from hospital discharge. Irrespective of rehabilitation services, there were no differences in functional change between NHW and NHB individuals, yet Hispanic individuals were less likely to improve [aOR=0.647, 95%CI (0.425,0.983)] compared to NHW. Additionally, Hispanic individuals were significantly less likely to receive any rehabilitation services [aOR=0.626, 95%CI (0.442,0.886)] and were half as likely to receive outpatient services [aOR=0.543, 95%CI (0.368,0.800)] as compared to NHW. ConclusionsRehabilitation is key to functional improvement after stroke. We are making strides in health equity between NHW and NHB individuals, yet there remain disparities in functional outcomes and in rehabilitation services particularly for Hispanic individuals after stroke.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 97%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 96%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 94%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 94%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 96%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.