Psychometric validation of an Arabic version of the WHO-5 wellbeing scale among Lebanese Adolescents
El Khoury Malhame, M.; Hallit, S.; Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J.; El Hajj, S.; Doumit, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionWellbeing in adolescence is frequently associated with positive developmental outcomes. The WHO-5 is widely recognized for its brevity, clarity, robust reliability, and cultural validity. In this study, we aimed to assess the psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the WHO-5 scale among Lebanese adolescents. MethodsThis cross-sectional study involved 681 Lebanese school students aged 15-18 years. Participants were assessed using WHO-5 (wellbeing), PHQ-9 (depression), and GAD-7 (anxiety) Arabic questionnaires at two-time points, 3 months apart. ResultsWe found that the 5 items of the WHO-5 converged into a single factor. Composite reliability of scores was adequate in the total sample ({omega} = .83 / = .83). The convergent validity for this model was satisfactory. We were able to show the invariance across gender at the configural, metric, and scalar levels, with males showing a higher level of wellbeing compared to females. The pre-posttest assessment for the WHO-5 scale was conducted on 358 participants; the intraclass correlation coefficient was adequate = 0.78 [95% CI .73; .82]. Our analyses also show that wellbeing was negatively correlated with depression (r = -.54; p < .001) and anxiety (r = -.52; p < .001). ConclusionThe Arabic WHO-5 among Lebanese adolescents displayed highly satisfactory psychometric properties, which are evidence of its validity. It could be used to better track positive mental health in this vulnerable age group and could highlight efficiency in interventions aiming to promote wellbeing in adolescents. It could also potentially identify at risk individuals.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 97%
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 97%
- Stress, coping, and quality of life in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 96%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 95%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health Conditions in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Asexual Youth in Brazil: a call for action 94%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 94%
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 96%
- Assessing the influence of parental anxiety on childhood anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Mental health status among family members of health care workers in Ningbo, China during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: a Cross-sectional Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 94%
- Longitudinal trends and risk factors for depressed mood among Canadian adults during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.