Cost-effective and Flexible Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) Using Adaptive Sampling-based Targeted Nanopore Sequencing (ASTN-seq)
Zhang, Z.; He, S.; Ding, T.; Liang, X.; Fang, C.; Zeng, H.; Xu, L.; Li, X.; Jia, L.; Zhang, S.; Su, W.; Su, P.; Yang, J.; Ren, J.; Lu, S.; Ren, Z.
Show abstract
Genetic diseases encompass a spectrum of disorders resulting from DNA variations. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a critical strategy for preventing recurrent miscarriage, foetal malformations, and the birth of children affected by chromosomal abnormalities and monogenic disorders. Traditional PGT techniques necessitate comprehensive pedigree genetic data for haplotype linkage analysis, whereas PGT employing third-generation sequencing (TGS) has distinct advantages, particularly in cases of incomplete pedigree information, de novo mutations, and complex pathogenic variants. Nevertheless, the widespread application of TGS-based PGT in clinical practice encounters hurdles owing to its high costs. Targeted sequencing technologies present a promising solution by selectively enriching regions of interest while disregarding nontargeted areas, offering a more cost-effective and flexible alternative. In this study, we employed next-generation sequencing (NGS) and adaptive sampling-based targeted nanopore sequencing (ASTN-seq) to analyse samples from five couples who carried balanced translocations and HBB gene pathogenic mutations, as well as three additional couples with monogenic diseases caused by mutations in PKD1, ASNS, or ALPL. ASTN-seq successfully identified various mutations and facilitated haplotype linkage analysis, confirming its accuracy and reliability. Successful embryo transfer and subsequent prenatal diagnosis in certain families underscore the potential of ASTN-seq in assisted reproduction. Compared with traditional NGS-based PGT techniques, our work highlights that ASTN-seq is a promising tool for PGT, offering cost-effective solutions for PGT, especially for incomplete pedigrees and de novo mutations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Overcoming the pitfalls of NGS-based molecular diagnosis of Shwachman-Diamond syndrome 96%
- Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing 94%
- Evaluating discordant somatic calls across mutation discovery approaches to minimize false negative drug-resistant findings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Copy number variation profile-based genomic subtyping of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in Chinese 92%
- CRISPR-Detector: Fast and Accurate Detection, Visualization, and Annotation of Genome-Wide Mutations Induced by Gene Editing Events 91%
- Endogamy and high prevalence of deleterious mutations in India: evidence from strong founder events 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- From GWAS Variant to Function: a Study of ~148,000 Variants for Blood Cell Traits. 90%
- A reference panel for linkage disequilibrium and genotype imputation using whole-genome sequencing data from 2,680 participants across India 90%
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic profiling of Vietnamese population from large-scale genomic analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing data 95%
- An integrated Asian human SNV and indel benchmark combining multiple sequencing methods 95%
- A novel high-throughput molecular counting method with single base-pair resolution enables accurate single-gene NIPT 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.