Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Cancer Diagnosis
Eladl, O. S. M. M.
Show abstract
Withdrawal StatementThe authors have withdrawn this manuscript because of some errors and mistakes in the submission, including the data analysis and authority, that need to be corrected. A major reason for the manuscript being withdrawn is due to a lack of credit being given to the person who carried out the work. After reviewing the manuscript, we decided to withdraw it to make the necessary revisions before submitting it. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as a reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements 95%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 95%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 92%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 93%
- Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 95%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 95%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.