Predicting adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery using multi-task deep neural networks, clinical features, and electrocardiograms
Ong, C. S.; Padros-Valls, R.; Reinertsen, E.; Song, S.; Young, K.; Sundt, T.; Stultz, C.; Aguirre, A. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundRisk stratification models estimate the probabilities of adverse outcomes after cardiac surgical procedures, which helps clinicians and patients make informed decisions. ObjectivesWe used the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and/or Society for Thoracic Surgeons (STS) variables to predict postoperative outcomes using deep learning methods that can incorporate diverse data types. MethodsWe developed a deep convolutional neural network ("ECGNet") that predicts operative mortality and other adverse outcomes using preoperative 12-lead ECGs (n=30,877) from 12,933 patients who underwent 13,299 cardiac surgical procedures. We also developed a deep neural network applied to preoperative STS variables ("STSNet"). STSNet and ECGNet are multi-task neural networks that utilize secondary outcomes to augment prediction of mortality using the same neural network. ResultsECGNet achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 for predicting operative mortality for all procedures and 0.93 for valve procedures. STSNet achieved a mean AUC of 0.85 for all procedures, with statistically similar performance as ECGNet for all procedures. Combining ECGNet and STSNet achieved a mean AUC of 0.90 for predicting operative mortality after all procedures, which is significantly higher than either ECGNet or STSNet alone. ConclusionsA deep neural network trained on STS features has higher predictive performance than previously reported for existing conventional models and is not limited to certain types of cardiac surgical procedures. A model trained on ECG alone can predict operative mortality with similar performance as STS features and adding ECG to STS features in a neural network can improve performance. These findings demonstrate the potential in leveraging deep learning on multidimensional data sources to predict outcomes after cardiac surgery. Condensed abstractIn this study, deep learning (DL) is applied to electrocardiograms and clinical features used in the standard STS risk prediction tools to generate new high-performing risk calculators for cardiac surgical procedures. Preoperative voltage waveforms contain information about cardiovascular risk and cardiac function and are passed as inputs to the deep learning model. These risk models apply to all cardiac procedures including those procedures that do not have standard STS risk calculators and provide improved performance. DL models enable the incorporation of additional modalities of data to improve risk prediction in cardiac surgery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 94%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from Echocardiogram Videos 94%
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Comprehensive Assessment of the Aortic Valve Stenosis Continuum in Echocardiography 93%
- Predicting the functional effects of voltage-gated potassium channel missense variants with multi-task learning 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- An assessment of the value of deep neural networks in genetic risk prediction for surgically relevant outcomes 94%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.