Back

Prognostic impact of E-wave and A-wave overlap after atrial fibrillation ablation

Saito, J.; Kato, D.; Sato, H.; Matsuda, T.; Koyanagi, Y.; Yoshihiro, K.; Gibo, Y.; Usumoto, S.; Kimura, T.; Shimazu, S.; Igawa, W.; Ebara, S.; Okabe, T.; ISOMURA, N.; Ochiai, M.

2024-12-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.12.27.24319712 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn adult patients with systolic heart failure, the presence of adjacent, nonoverlapping E and A waves on Doppler echocardiography is associated with optimal cardiac output and favorable clinical outcomes. However, the clinical significance of echocardiographic overlap in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the relationship between E-wave and A-wave overlap, assessed the day after catheter ablation, and the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (AR) following AF ablation. MethodsPatients with AF who underwent first-time arrhythmia ablation were included in this study. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on the day following catheter ablation to evaluate the presence of E- and A-wave overlap. The relationship between overlap length and recurrence of AR after AF ablation was analyzed. ResultsThe study included 175 patients (124 males; mean age: 68 years [range 52-79]; mean CHA2DS2-Vasc score: 2 [range 0-4]; and 93 with paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF ablation. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of heart failure history or echocardiographic parameters prior to catheter ablation. However, the absolute overlap length was significantly prolonged in the AR group (59 ms [range 9-160] vs. 120 ms [range 28.6-226]; P < .001). Furthermore, the rate of AR was significantly lower in the group without prolonged overlap length (HR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.07-0.30]; P < .001). These findings were consistent across all AF types. ConclusionsThe length of E-wave and A-wave overlap appears to be a significant predictor of AR following AF ablation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.