Back

Judged by your neighbors: Brain structural normativity profiles for large and heterogeneous samples

Leenings, R.; Winter, N. R.; Ernsting, J.; Konowski, M.; Holstein, V.; Meinert, S.; Spanagel, J.; Barkhau, C.; Fisch, L.; Goltermann, J.; Gerdes, M. F.; Grotegerd, D.; Leehr, E. J.; Peters, A.; Krist, L.; Willich, S. N.; Pischon, T.; Völzke, H.; Haubold, J.; Kauczor, H.-U.; Niendorf, T.; Richter, M. F.; Dannlowski, U.; Berger, K.; Jiang, X.; Cole, J.; Opel, N.; Hahn, T.

2024-12-26 neurology
10.1101/2024.12.24.24319598 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite established consensus about the individuality of brain physiology and structural changes, current neuroimaging biomarker paradigms heavily rely on population averages. Here, we define normativity not as a single reference point but as a landscape of permissible configurations arising from diverse physiological manifestations. MethodsWe introduce the Nearest Neighbor Normativity (N3) framework, designed to parse the natural heterogeneity in brain structural measurements into a diversity-aware biomarker of brain structural decline. Through repeated comparisons within different demographic subgroups, N3 contextualizes an individuals measurements from several viewpoints along the aging continuum. Relying on local density estimation, it accommodates multiple, shared normative configurations within and across age groups. We use T1-weighted MRI data from 29,883 individuals for training and 7,013 individuals for validation, and benchmark our framework against Brain Age models and Normative Modeling. We evaluate each biomarkers ability to detect neurodegenerative diseases, using them as representative models of atypical brain structural decline. ResultsIn group-level analyses, the N3 biomarker shows the largest effect sizes in the detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimers Disease, and Frontotemporal Dementia. Similarly, the N3 biomarker achieves the highest predictive performance in the classification of neurodegenerative diseases on a single subject level. Notably, the N3 estimates remain stable across age and robust to compositional changes in the reference sample. Finally, correlation analyses indicate that it captures distinct and complementary aspects of brain structural variation compared to existing approaches. ConclusionsOur findings underscore that rethinking normativity assessments to explicitly accommodate natural inter-individual variability can enhance the efficacy and translational value of neuroimaging biomarkers and advance our collective efforts toward truly personalized patient care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.