Judged by your neighbors: Brain structural normativity profiles for large and heterogeneous samples
Leenings, R.; Winter, N. R.; Ernsting, J.; Konowski, M.; Holstein, V.; Meinert, S.; Spanagel, J.; Barkhau, C.; Fisch, L.; Goltermann, J.; Gerdes, M. F.; Grotegerd, D.; Leehr, E. J.; Peters, A.; Krist, L.; Willich, S. N.; Pischon, T.; Völzke, H.; Haubold, J.; Kauczor, H.-U.; Niendorf, T.; Richter, M. F.; Dannlowski, U.; Berger, K.; Jiang, X.; Cole, J.; Opel, N.; Hahn, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite established consensus about the individuality of brain physiology and structural changes, current neuroimaging biomarker paradigms heavily rely on population averages. Here, we define normativity not as a single reference point but as a landscape of permissible configurations arising from diverse physiological manifestations. MethodsWe introduce the Nearest Neighbor Normativity (N3) framework, designed to parse the natural heterogeneity in brain structural measurements into a diversity-aware biomarker of brain structural decline. Through repeated comparisons within different demographic subgroups, N3 contextualizes an individuals measurements from several viewpoints along the aging continuum. Relying on local density estimation, it accommodates multiple, shared normative configurations within and across age groups. We use T1-weighted MRI data from 29,883 individuals for training and 7,013 individuals for validation, and benchmark our framework against Brain Age models and Normative Modeling. We evaluate each biomarkers ability to detect neurodegenerative diseases, using them as representative models of atypical brain structural decline. ResultsIn group-level analyses, the N3 biomarker shows the largest effect sizes in the detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimers Disease, and Frontotemporal Dementia. Similarly, the N3 biomarker achieves the highest predictive performance in the classification of neurodegenerative diseases on a single subject level. Notably, the N3 estimates remain stable across age and robust to compositional changes in the reference sample. Finally, correlation analyses indicate that it captures distinct and complementary aspects of brain structural variation compared to existing approaches. ConclusionsOur findings underscore that rethinking normativity assessments to explicitly accommodate natural inter-individual variability can enhance the efficacy and translational value of neuroimaging biomarkers and advance our collective efforts toward truly personalized patient care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ComBat-Predict enhances generalizability of neuroimaging models to new sites 97%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 96%
- Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards the Interpretability of Deep Learning Models for Multi-modal Neuroimaging: Finding Structural Changes of the Ageing Brain 97%
- Brain-age prediction: a systematic comparison of machine learning workflows 96%
- Predicting dysfunctional age-related task activations from resting-state network alterations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feature attention graph neural network for estimating brain age and identifying important neural connections in mouse models of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease 97%
- Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching 96%
- Brain-wide functional connectome analysis of 40,000 individuals reveals brain networks that show aging effects in older adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison and aggregation of event sequences across ten cohorts to describe the consensus biomarker evolution in Alzheimer’s disease 95%
- An explainable self-attention deep neural network for detecting mild cognitive impairment using multi-inputbdigital drawing tasks 94%
- Differential effects of aging, Alzheimer's pathology, and APOE4 on longitudinal functional connectivity and episodic memory in older adults 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.