Back

Subtypes of Older Adults Starting Long-Term Care in Japan: Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach

Hamasaki, Y.; Iwagami, M.; Komiyama, J.; Ito, Y.; Taniguchi, Y.; Inokuchi, R.; Watanabe, T.; Goto, T.; Kuroda, N.; Suzuki, A.; Yoshie, S.; Ishizaki, T.; Iijima, K.; Tamiya, N.

2024-12-29 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2024.12.24.24319593 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe older population requiring long-term care (LTC) exhibits heterogeneity in physical and cognitive functions; however, an established classification is lacking. We aimed to identify distinct subgroups of older adults with LTC needs using unsupervised machine learning and to examine differences in their prognoses. DesignRetrospective cohort study. Setting and participantsUsing survey data for care-need certification (linked to LTC and medical insurance claims) in City A, Japan, we identified community-dwelling adults aged [≥] 65 years who started LTC. Data from City B were used for validation of clustering. MethodsWe applied latent class analysis to group the participants in City A, based on all 74 items (38 on physical functions, 9 on cognitive functions, 15 on behavioral problems, and 12 on medical procedures) in the Japanese standardized care-needs certification survey. Then, we examined the association between the identified subtypes and four outcomes, including death, hospitalization, nursing home admission, and care-need level deterioration, using regression models. ResultsAmong 3,841 participants in City A (median age, 83 years; 59.3% female), five subtypes were identified: (i) mild physical, (ii) mild cognitive, (iii) moderate physical, (iv) moderate multicomponent, and (v) severe multicomponent. The results of clustering were replicated in City B. Compared with the mild physical subtype, the severe multicomponent subtype showed the highest risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-3.24), and nursing home admission (aHR 5.91; 95% CI 4.57-7.63). The moderate physical subtype showed a higher risk of hospitalization (aHR 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.49), and the moderate multicomponent subtype was more likely to experience care-need deterioration (adjusted odds ratio 1.67; 95% CI 1.26-2.22). Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study identified five subtypes of older adults who started LTC. These findings inform individualized care decisions and tailored planning of medical and LTC services.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%