Subtypes of Older Adults Starting Long-Term Care in Japan: Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach
Hamasaki, Y.; Iwagami, M.; Komiyama, J.; Ito, Y.; Taniguchi, Y.; Inokuchi, R.; Watanabe, T.; Goto, T.; Kuroda, N.; Suzuki, A.; Yoshie, S.; Ishizaki, T.; Iijima, K.; Tamiya, N.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe older population requiring long-term care (LTC) exhibits heterogeneity in physical and cognitive functions; however, an established classification is lacking. We aimed to identify distinct subgroups of older adults with LTC needs using unsupervised machine learning and to examine differences in their prognoses. DesignRetrospective cohort study. Setting and participantsUsing survey data for care-need certification (linked to LTC and medical insurance claims) in City A, Japan, we identified community-dwelling adults aged [≥] 65 years who started LTC. Data from City B were used for validation of clustering. MethodsWe applied latent class analysis to group the participants in City A, based on all 74 items (38 on physical functions, 9 on cognitive functions, 15 on behavioral problems, and 12 on medical procedures) in the Japanese standardized care-needs certification survey. Then, we examined the association between the identified subtypes and four outcomes, including death, hospitalization, nursing home admission, and care-need level deterioration, using regression models. ResultsAmong 3,841 participants in City A (median age, 83 years; 59.3% female), five subtypes were identified: (i) mild physical, (ii) mild cognitive, (iii) moderate physical, (iv) moderate multicomponent, and (v) severe multicomponent. The results of clustering were replicated in City B. Compared with the mild physical subtype, the severe multicomponent subtype showed the highest risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-3.24), and nursing home admission (aHR 5.91; 95% CI 4.57-7.63). The moderate physical subtype showed a higher risk of hospitalization (aHR 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.49), and the moderate multicomponent subtype was more likely to experience care-need deterioration (adjusted odds ratio 1.67; 95% CI 1.26-2.22). Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study identified five subtypes of older adults who started LTC. These findings inform individualized care decisions and tailored planning of medical and LTC services.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Do Assisted Living Facilities That Offer a Dementia Care Program Differ from Those That Do Not? A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study in Ontario, Canada 93%
- Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: Examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design 93%
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Care Utilization and Medical Institutional Death among Older Adults by Home Care Facility Type: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Fukuoka, Japan 95%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 95%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frailty and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19: retrospective observational study 94%
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 93%
- Clinical Suspicion of COVID-19 in Nursing Home residents: symptoms and mortality risk factors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 95%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 93%
- Frailty trajectories in the oldest old: Is the level or the rate of change more predictive of mortality? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.