The Dynamic Affect Recognition Test: Construction And Validation In Neurodegenerative Syndromes
Rankin, K. P.; Ulugut, H.; Radke, A.; Grossman, S.; Poorzand, P.; Shany-Ur, T.; Kramer, J. H.; Possin, K. L.; Sturm, V. E.; Gorno-Tempini, M. L.; Miller, B. L.
Show abstract
Learning objectiveTo validate a novel video-based emotion identification measure in persons with neurodegeneration and show correspondence to emotion-relevant brain systems BackgroundGiven advances in disease-modifying therapies for dementia, the dementia field needs objective, practical behavioral assessment tools for patient trial selection and monitoring. The Dynamic Affect Recognition Test (DART) was designed to remedy limitations of instruments typically used to measure emotion identification deficits in persons with dementia (PWD). MethodParticipants included 372 individuals, including 257 early stage PWD (Clinical Dementia Rating [≤]1, Mini-Mental State Examination [≥]20; 66 behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [bvFTD], 27 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia [svPPA], 23 semantic bvFTD [sbvFTD], 33 non-fluent PPA [nfvPPA], 26 progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], 28 corticobasal syndrome [CBS], 42 Alzheimers disease [AD], 12 logopenic variant PPA [lvPPA]), and 115 healthy controls (HC), watched 12 15-second videos of an actor expressing a basic emotion (happy, surprised, sad, angry, fearful, disgusted) via congruent facial/vocal/postural cues, with semantically neutral scripts. Participants selected the emotion from a randomized visual array. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was performed to show brain structure correlates of DART, controlling for non-emotional naming ability (Boston Naming Test, BNT). ResultsDART performance was worse in PWD than older HC (p<0.001), with the lowest scores observed in the sbvFTD group. A DART 10 cut-off score differentiates PWD from HC with a 90% sensitivity and 49% specificity (AUC=82%). A DART 9/12 score yielded 93% sensitivity/67% specificity (AUC=87%) for discriminating social cognition disorders from HC, while a 7/12 score differentiated sbvFTD from HC with 100% sensitivity/93% specificity (AUC=97%). VBM showed poorer DART performance significantly predicts focal brain volume loss in right-sided emotion processing areas including insula, temporal pole, caudate, superior frontal gyrus and supplementary motor cortex (pFWE<0.05). ConclusionsThe DART is a brief, psychometrically robust video-based test of emotion reading (i) designed to be practically useful in realistic assessment settings, (ii) effectively reveals emotion identification impairments in PWD, (iii) shows specificity for identifying PWD exhibiting real-life SCDs (i.e. bvFTD, svPPA, sbvFTD), (iv) corresponds to the expected structural anatomy of emotion reading, and (v) is freely available to researchers and clinicians.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 95%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 95%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of DSM-5 mild and major neurocognitive disorder in India: Results from the LASI-DAD 96%
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 96%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a harmonized memory score for multicenter Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research 94%
- White matter integrity is associated with cognition and amyloid burden in older adult Koreans along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum 94%
- Medial temporal lobe atrophy patterns in early- versus late-onset amnestic Alzheimer's disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The PREVENT Dementia programme: Baseline demographic, lifestyle, imaging and cognitive data from a midlife cohort study investigating risk factors for dementia 94%
- Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia 94%
- Self- versus caregiver-reported apathy across neurological disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 95%
- Race/Ethnic Disparities in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The Northern Manhattan Study 95%
- Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.