Back

The Dynamic Affect Recognition Test: Construction And Validation In Neurodegenerative Syndromes

Rankin, K. P.; Ulugut, H.; Radke, A.; Grossman, S.; Poorzand, P.; Shany-Ur, T.; Kramer, J. H.; Possin, K. L.; Sturm, V. E.; Gorno-Tempini, M. L.; Miller, B. L.

2024-12-26 neurology
10.1101/2024.12.23.24319565 medRxiv
Show abstract

Learning objectiveTo validate a novel video-based emotion identification measure in persons with neurodegeneration and show correspondence to emotion-relevant brain systems BackgroundGiven advances in disease-modifying therapies for dementia, the dementia field needs objective, practical behavioral assessment tools for patient trial selection and monitoring. The Dynamic Affect Recognition Test (DART) was designed to remedy limitations of instruments typically used to measure emotion identification deficits in persons with dementia (PWD). MethodParticipants included 372 individuals, including 257 early stage PWD (Clinical Dementia Rating [&le;]1, Mini-Mental State Examination [&ge;]20; 66 behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [bvFTD], 27 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia [svPPA], 23 semantic bvFTD [sbvFTD], 33 non-fluent PPA [nfvPPA], 26 progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], 28 corticobasal syndrome [CBS], 42 Alzheimers disease [AD], 12 logopenic variant PPA [lvPPA]), and 115 healthy controls (HC), watched 12 15-second videos of an actor expressing a basic emotion (happy, surprised, sad, angry, fearful, disgusted) via congruent facial/vocal/postural cues, with semantically neutral scripts. Participants selected the emotion from a randomized visual array. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was performed to show brain structure correlates of DART, controlling for non-emotional naming ability (Boston Naming Test, BNT). ResultsDART performance was worse in PWD than older HC (p<0.001), with the lowest scores observed in the sbvFTD group. A DART 10 cut-off score differentiates PWD from HC with a 90% sensitivity and 49% specificity (AUC=82%). A DART 9/12 score yielded 93% sensitivity/67% specificity (AUC=87%) for discriminating social cognition disorders from HC, while a 7/12 score differentiated sbvFTD from HC with 100% sensitivity/93% specificity (AUC=97%). VBM showed poorer DART performance significantly predicts focal brain volume loss in right-sided emotion processing areas including insula, temporal pole, caudate, superior frontal gyrus and supplementary motor cortex (pFWE<0.05). ConclusionsThe DART is a brief, psychometrically robust video-based test of emotion reading (i) designed to be practically useful in realistic assessment settings, (ii) effectively reveals emotion identification impairments in PWD, (iii) shows specificity for identifying PWD exhibiting real-life SCDs (i.e. bvFTD, svPPA, sbvFTD), (iv) corresponds to the expected structural anatomy of emotion reading, and (v) is freely available to researchers and clinicians.

Published in Assessment · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.