Patient safety education in undergraduate medical curricula: a concept analysis and scoping review protocol
Bowman-Newmark, J.; Brock, E.; Vosper, H.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aims to establish how the phenomenon of patient safety education manifests within undergraduate medical curricula. The specific objectives are to conduct a concept analysis, in order to make explicit the concept of patient safety education and inform its operational definition. Thereafter, to conduct a scoping review, in order to systematically map what educational content is taught, who is taught that content, and how that content is taught. IntroductionPreliminary searches identified four extant systematic reviews, published between 2010 and 2022, which investigated different aspects of how patient safety education manifested within undergraduate medical curricula. Notwithstanding, those findings do not provide a sufficiently robust basis to inform contemporaneous discourse. Eligibility criteriaThe participants, concept, and context framework will be used to determine the evidence sources eligible for inclusion in the scoping review. Eligible participants will include learners matriculated on undergraduate medical programmes, and the educators that teach learners on those programmes. The concept will be patient safety education, according to an operational definition that will be established. Eligible contexts will include the taught curricula of undergraduate programmes in medicine. MethodsAn exploratory and descriptive study that will sequentially implement the Walker and Avant framework for concept analysis and the updated JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Eight electronic databases and one internet search engine will be utilised to identify sources published between 1 May 2014 and 30 November 2024. Pre-defined eligibility criteria will be used to select sources. Data will be extracted and analysed, and findings will be presented.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions 94%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 90%
- Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts 90%
- Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suicide prevention curriculum development for health and social care students: Protocol for a scoping review 93%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 93%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews 94%
- Evaluation of the sensitivity, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production 92%
- Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 90%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 90%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.