Back

Exploring the specific predictive ability of multiple domains of spatial ability on STEM educational outcomes

Zhou, Q.; Wang, Z.; Rimfeld, K.; Allegrini, A. G.; Plomin, R.; Malanchini, M.

2024-12-22 genetics
10.1101/2024.12.20.629833 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractResearch has implicated spatial ability as a robust predictor of aptitude, interest, and choice in STEM education and career pursuits. We address three under-explored questions regarding the role of spatial ability in STEM. First, can spatial ability consistently predict STEM success beyond other cognitive skills? Second, what aspects of spatial ability, if any, can predict success in STEM more accurately? Third, to what extent can genetic and environmental factors account for these predictions? We addressed these questions by leveraging data from the Twins Early Development Study (N = 3,936; age range = 16-22) and using 16 tests that assessed three domains of spatial ability: navigation, object manipulation, and visualization. Results show that all three domains are highly predictive of STEM educational outcomes, especially STEM degree choice. These associations persisted after accounting for verbal and general cognitive abilities (g), albeit attenuated. Associations were strongest for tests of object manipulation (e.g., 2D and 3D drawing, pattern assembly and mental rotation). Genetic factors accounted for most of the observed associations between spatial ability and STEM outcomes (62% - 86%) --genetic variance was mostly shared with g ([~] 40%) and, to a lesser extent, verbal ability ([~] 25%). Our findings highlight the potential utility of spatial ability as a specific predictor of success in STEM education and career choice beyond other cognitive abilities. Screening for and training spatial skills is likely useful for identifying potential, fostering talent, and improving outcomes in STEM. Significance StatementLeveraging a comprehensive battery of 16 spatial ability tests across multiple domains, we show that spatial ability has specific utility for predicting success in STEM education. Spatial skills predict success in STEM above and beyond other cognitive abilities, particularly when it comes to STEM engagement and pursuing further STEM education. Thus, spatial skills may be a fruitful target for policymakers, stakeholders, and industries looking to develop interventions, identify and foster talent, and reduce outcome disparities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
5
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
12
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
13
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
18
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
20
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%