Back

Prevalence and factors associated with undernutrition among under-five children with sickle cell disease at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: A facility-based cross-sectional study.

Namubamba, A.; Wamani, H.; Namaganda, A.; Namagala, U.; Cheputyo, P.; Muramuzi, D.; Kamukama, S.

2024-12-20 nutrition
10.1101/2024.12.18.24319255 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) significantly contributes to under-five morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa and increases vulnerability to undernutrition. However, limited studies exist on the prevalence of undernutrition and its associated factors among children under five years with SCD in Uganda. We assessed the prevalence of undernutrition and its associated factors among children with SCD aged 6-59 months attending the sickle cell clinic at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. MethodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 329 children aged 6-59 months. Data was collected in August 2022 using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using STATA version 14.0. Modified Poisson regression was used to identify the factors associated with undernutrition. ResultsThe prevalence of undernutrition among children with SCD aged 6-59 months was 31.3% (n=103) 95% CI 26.5, 36.5; 27.4% (n=90) 95% CI 22.8, 32.5 were stunted, and 14.3% (n=47) 95% CI 10.8, 18.5 were underweight. Undernutrition among children with SCD was statistically significantly associated with children below 24 months but not breastfeeding (aPR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.09-1.48; P-0.002), not immunized against measles (aPR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.02-1.68; P-0.03), and child not taking hydroxyurea drug (aPR=1.5; 95% CI: 1.07-2.08; P-0.017). ConclusionEarly weaning of children, not being immunized against measles, and the child not taking hydroxyurea drug were great contributors to undernutrition. There is a need for sensitization of the caretakers about these predictors, and integrating hydroxyurea treatment in the standard care package of management of SCD in Uganda.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.