Back

Decoding pre-movement neural activity from thalamic LFPs for adaptive neurostimulation in tremor patients

Plazas, F. R.; Simpson, T. G.; Wehmeyer, L.; Shah, R. S.; Brannigan, J.; Hart, M. G.; Andrade, P.; Morgante, F.; Visser-Vandewalle, V.; Pereira, E. A.; Tan, H.; He, S.

2024-12-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.12.18.24319164 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveUnderstanding the neural mechanisms underlying movement initiation is crucial for advancing movement-driven adaptive deep brain stimulation therapies for tremor disorders. We investigated the feasibility of decoding pre-movement periods of upper limb movements by machine learning using thalamic local field potentials (LFPs) and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals. ApproachData were analysed from 11 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery, employing machine learning models--including logistic regression, gradient-boosted decision trees, and convolutional neural networks--to distinguish rest periods from pre-movement periods. Main resultsOur results demonstrate that early neural correlates can predict movement onset, achieving above-chance decoding performance starting approximately 680 ms before movement execution using thalamic LFPs and 1.09 s using EEGs. Individualized, patient-specific decoders outperformed cross-patient models, reflecting substantial inter-patient variability in neural modulatory patterns. Additionally, multiple frequency bands contributed independently to decoding performance, emphasizing the importance of incorporating a broad spectrum of frequencies rather than relying solely on single canonical bands. SignificanceThese findings underscore the value of personalized, multi-band machine learning approaches in capturing the neural correlates preceding movement. They support the development of adaptive neurostimulation therapies that enhance the effectiveness of clinical interventions through tailored models that account for patient-specific neural activity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.